Comparison of conventional vs self-etching adhesive bonds to caries-affected dentin
- PMID: 11203811
Comparison of conventional vs self-etching adhesive bonds to caries-affected dentin
Abstract
The mechanism of resin adhesion to caries-affected dentin is still unclear. This study evaluated the interfacial morphology of two bonding systems to caries-affected dentin, coupled with the measurement of microtensile bond strengths (mu TBS). Carious human molars were prepared as previously described in Nakajima and others (1995) and were bonded with Single Bond (SB) or FluoroBond (FB) according to the manufacturer's instructions, followed by creation of AP-X composite buildups. After one day of storage in 37 degrees C water, the teeth were serially sectioned vertically into 0.8 mm slabs, trimmed to yield a 1 mm2 test area, and tested to failure in a Bencor device used in an Instron machine operated at 1 mm/min. Resin-dentin interfaces were observed with SEM before or after acid/base challenge. Bonding to normal dentin with the two bonding systems (SB and FB) showed tensile bond strengths significantly higher than those to caries-affected dentin. The moist bonding technique significantly increased bond strength of SB to normal and caries-affected dentin. SEM examination revealed that typical hybrid layer and resin tags could not be formed to caries-affected dentin. The results suggested that resin penetration may be prevented by occlusion of dentinal tubules by mineral deposits that may also impart acid-resistance to the intertubular matrix of caries-affected dentin.
Similar articles
-
Long-term durability of resin dentin interface: nanoleakage vs. microtensile bond strength.Oper Dent. 2002 May-Jun;27(3):289-96. Oper Dent. 2002. PMID: 12022462 Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin.Oper Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):27-35. Oper Dent. 2001. PMID: 11203773
-
Bonding to sound vs caries-affected dentin using photo- and dual-cure adhesives.Oper Dent. 2005 Jan-Feb;30(1):90-8. Oper Dent. 2005. PMID: 15765963
-
Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment.Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e24-37. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.149. Epub 2009 Dec 14. Dent Mater. 2010. PMID: 20005565 Review.
-
Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review.Dent Mater. 1995 Mar;11(2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8. Dent Mater. 1995. PMID: 8621032 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of dentinal pretreatments on coronal dentin primary carious lesions: a field emission SEM study.Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Sep;7(3):140-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-003-0221-8. Epub 2003 Aug 21. Clin Oral Investig. 2003. PMID: 12920610 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of a Papain-based Chemomechanical Agent on Structure of Dentin and Bond Strength: An in vitro Study.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):161-166. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1504. Epub 2018 Jun 1. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018. PMID: 30131634 Free PMC article.
-
Durable bonds at the adhesive/dentin interface: an impossible mission or simply a moving target?Braz Dent Sci. 2012 Jan;15(1):4-18. doi: 10.14295/bds.2012.v15i1.790. Braz Dent Sci. 2012. PMID: 24855586 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of the volume of restorative material on the concentration of stresses in the restorative interface.J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Jun 1;13(6):e558-e563. doi: 10.4317/jced.57781. eCollection 2021 Jun. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021. PMID: 34188761 Free PMC article.
-
Dentin biomodification: strategies, renewable resources and clinical applications.Dent Mater. 2014 Jan;30(1):62-76. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.012. Epub 2013 Dec 3. Dent Mater. 2014. PMID: 24309436 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous