Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner
- PMID: 11203849
Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner
Abstract
Due to the lack of adhesiveness of amalgam to tooth structure, several adhesive cements have been utilized in bonded amalgam restorations. This study evaluated whether Fuji-II glass-ionomer cement is an appropriate adhesive liner in bonded amalgam restorations. Two adhesive composite luting cements (Amalgambond Plus and Panavia-21) and Copalite cavity liner were compared. The study was conducted in two phases. In the first part, we quantitatively assessed the tensile bond strengths as well as the failure modes of amalgam bonded to human dentin, using different adhesive liners. In each group, the flat dentin surface was treated with the assigned adhesive cement with a Teflon mold, followed by condensation of amalgam (Valiant PhD) onto it. Each group's mean tensile bond strengths were recorded and the statistical analysis by one way ANOVA showed no significant differences among groups (p > 0.05). Similar to the fracture patterns of the Amalgambond Plus and Panavia-21 groups, the failure mode of Fuji-II group was predominantly adhesive fracture. In the second part, the fracture strengths of amalgam restored teeth were measured using different adhesive liners. Standard MOD cavities were prepared in each tooth except for the intact tooth group. After treatment with the assigned adhesives or varnish, the cavities were restored with amalgam. Fracture strengths were then measured and the fractured interfaces examined using a scanning electron microscope. The fracture strengths of the intact tooth, Amalgambond Plus, Panavia-21 and Fuji-II groups were significantly higher than those of the Copalite and prepared cavity without restoration groups (p < 0.01). Accordingly, Fuji-II glass-ionomer cement, when used as an adhesive liner of amalgam restoration, may effectively reinforce the remaining tooth structure and, therefore, enhance the fracture resistance of the amalgam-restored teeth.
Similar articles
-
Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.Oper Dent. 1996 May-Jun;21(3):110-5. Oper Dent. 1996. PMID: 9002870
-
Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.Oper Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):512-9. Oper Dent. 2000. PMID: 11203864
-
Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.Indian J Dent Res. 1999 Apr-Jun;10(2):43-53. Indian J Dent Res. 1999. PMID: 10865391
-
Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.Oper Dent. 2000 Mar-Apr;25(2):121-9. Oper Dent. 2000. PMID: 11203798 Review.
-
[Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 2008;63(4):135-46. Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 2008. PMID: 19227687 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the push-out shear bond strength of four types of glass ionomers when used to bond amalgam: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent. 2011 Oct;14(4):337-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.87193. J Conserv Dent. 2011. PMID: 22144798 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent. 2009 Oct;12(4):154-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.58338. J Conserv Dent. 2009. PMID: 20543925 Free PMC article.
-
To Evaluate the Effect of Different Adhesive Materials on the Microleakage of Bonded Amalgam Restorations: An in vitro Study.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 Sep;5(3):185-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1163. Epub 2012 Dec 5. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012. PMID: 25206165 Free PMC article.
-
Cusp fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with the bonded amalgam technique using various luting agents.Int J Dent. 2009;2009:946830. doi: 10.1155/2009/946830. Epub 2008 Dec 25. Int J Dent. 2009. PMID: 20339450 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of intra-orifice barriers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth - an ex-vivo study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Feb;9(2):ZC17-20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11609.5552. Epub 2015 Feb 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015. PMID: 25859518 Free PMC article.