Design features that may influence bacterial plaque retention: a retrospective analysis of failed implants
- PMID: 11203932
Design features that may influence bacterial plaque retention: a retrospective analysis of failed implants
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to conduct a postmortem examination of retrieved failed dental implants to identify design characteristics that may have contributed to premature loss.
Method and materials: Forty-five failed implants retrieved from 40 patients with no significant risk factors for implant failure (e.g., history of smoking or diabetes) were examined by scanning electron microscopy. All implants were placed by general dentists or periodontists in private practice and had functioned for an average of 4 years.
Results: Several design features of currently used implants present plaque-retentive areas. Plaque accumulation occurred along the implant-transmucosal abutment interfaces, transmucosal abutment-prosthesis interfaces, implant-prosthesis interfaces, and on surfaces of the abutment, the implant, and the prosthesis. The size of the microgap between the various components, the degree of surface roughness of the restorations and abutments, the exposure of plasma-sprayed coatings and threaded surfaces of implants, and overcontouring of implant restorations contributed to plaque accumulation and provided an ideal environment for bacterial colonization.
Conclusion: These implant features may be key precipitating or exacerbating factors in the development of peri-implant inflammation, predisposing patients to implant failure.
Similar articles
-
Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):616-26. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009. PMID: 19885401 Review.
-
Bacterial plaque colonization around dental implant surfaces.Implant Dent. 2006 Sep;15(3):298-304. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000226823.58425.19. Implant Dent. 2006. PMID: 16966904
-
Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):777-84. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006. PMID: 17066640
-
A 16-year study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments.J Oral Implantol. 2005;31(6):269-75. doi: 10.1563/753.1. J Oral Implantol. 2005. PMID: 16447899
-
Biofilm related to dental implants.Implant Dent. 2010 Oct;19(5):387-93. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181effa53. Implant Dent. 2010. PMID: 20881809 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of Microgap and Bacterial Leakage of Two Types of Internal Implant-Abutment Union.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S792-S793. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1012_23. Epub 2023 Dec 20. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024. PMID: 38595421 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of the Diode Laser against the Microbiome on Composites Closing the Screw Access Hall (Sah) in the Reconstruction of Dental Implants: Ex Vivo Studies.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 18;19(12):7494. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127494. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35742743 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular leakage at implant-abutment connection--in vitro investigation of tightness of internal conical implant-abutment connections against endotoxin penetration.Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0317-x. Epub 2009 Jul 23. Clin Oral Investig. 2010. PMID: 19629543
-
The depth of the implant mucosal tunnel modifies the development and resolution of experimental peri-implant mucositis: A case-control study.J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Feb;46(2):248-255. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13066. Epub 2019 Feb 7. J Clin Periodontol. 2019. PMID: 30638273 Free PMC article.
-
Morse taper dental implants and platform switching: The new paradigm in oral implantology.Eur J Dent. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):148-154. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.175677. Eur J Dent. 2016. PMID: 27011755 Free PMC article. Review.