Positioning long lines: contrast versus plain radiography
- PMID: 11207231
- PMCID: PMC1721220
- DOI: 10.1136/fn.84.2.f129
Positioning long lines: contrast versus plain radiography
Abstract
Aim: To assess the value of contrast versus plain radiography in determining radio-opaque long line tip position in neonates.
Methods: In a prospective study, plain radiography was performed after insertion of radio-opaque long lines. If the line tip was not visible on the plain film, a second film with contrast was obtained in an attempt to visualise the tip.
Results: Sixty eight lines were inserted during the study period, 62 of which were included in the study. In 31, a second radiographic examination with contrast was necessary to determine position of the tip. In 29 of these, the line tip was clearly visualised with contrast. On two occasions, the line tip could not be seen because the contrast had filled the vein and obscured the tip from view. Eight of the lines that required a second radiograph with contrast were repositioned.
Conclusion: Intravenous contrast should be routinely used in the assessment of long line position in the neonate.
Comment in
-
Positioning of long lines.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 Jan;86(1):F68-9. doi: 10.1136/fn.86.1.f68-b. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002. PMID: 11815557 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Positioning long lines: response to Reece et al.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 Nov;87(3):F233. doi: 10.1136/fn.87.3.f233. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002. PMID: 12391008 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Long line positioning in neonates: does computed radiography improve visibility?Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Jan;89(1):F44-5. doi: 10.1136/fn.89.1.F44. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004. PMID: 14711855 Free PMC article.
-
Does radio-opaque contrast improve radiographic localisation of percutaneous central venous lines?Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Jan;89(1):F41-3. doi: 10.1136/fn.89.1.F41. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004. PMID: 14711854 Free PMC article.
-
The use of targeted neonatal echocardiography to confirm placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates.Am J Perinatol. 2012 Feb;29(2):101-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295649. Epub 2011 Nov 21. Am J Perinatol. 2012. PMID: 22105438
-
Are supine chest and abdominal radiographs the best way to confirm PICC placement in neonates?Neonatal Netw. 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):23-35. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.29.1.23. Neonatal Netw. 2010. PMID: 20085874 Review.
-
Medical imaging.Postgrad Med J. 1991 Apr;67(786):334-46. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.67.786.334. Postgrad Med J. 1991. PMID: 2068025 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Early pericardial effusion as complication of umbilical venous catheter insertion in extreme preterm baby: A case report.Clin Case Rep. 2021 Feb 18;9(4):2109-2112. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.3957. eCollection 2021 Apr. Clin Case Rep. 2021. PMID: 33936648 Free PMC article.
-
Central venous lines in neonates: a study of 2186 catheters.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Nov;89(6):F504-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.049189. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004. PMID: 15499142 Free PMC article.
-
Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade as complications of neonatal long lines: are they really a problem?Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Jul;88(4):F292-5. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.4.f292. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003. PMID: 12819160 Free PMC article.
-
Long line positioning in neonates: does computed radiography improve visibility?Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Jan;89(1):F44-5. doi: 10.1136/fn.89.1.F44. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004. PMID: 14711855 Free PMC article.
-
Role of a radiopaque agent and surveillance radiographs for peripherally inserted central catheters in newborn infants.Pediatr Radiol. 2023 Oct;53(11):2235-2244. doi: 10.1007/s00247-023-05705-7. Epub 2023 Jul 25. Pediatr Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37490126 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources