Positioning long lines: contrast versus plain radiography
- PMID: 11207231
- PMCID: PMC1721220
- DOI: 10.1136/fn.84.2.f129
Positioning long lines: contrast versus plain radiography
Abstract
Aim: To assess the value of contrast versus plain radiography in determining radio-opaque long line tip position in neonates.
Methods: In a prospective study, plain radiography was performed after insertion of radio-opaque long lines. If the line tip was not visible on the plain film, a second film with contrast was obtained in an attempt to visualise the tip.
Results: Sixty eight lines were inserted during the study period, 62 of which were included in the study. In 31, a second radiographic examination with contrast was necessary to determine position of the tip. In 29 of these, the line tip was clearly visualised with contrast. On two occasions, the line tip could not be seen because the contrast had filled the vein and obscured the tip from view. Eight of the lines that required a second radiograph with contrast were repositioned.
Conclusion: Intravenous contrast should be routinely used in the assessment of long line position in the neonate.
Comment in
-
Positioning of long lines.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 Jan;86(1):F68-9. doi: 10.1136/fn.86.1.f68-b. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002. PMID: 11815557 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Positioning long lines: response to Reece et al.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 Nov;87(3):F233. doi: 10.1136/fn.87.3.f233. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002. PMID: 12391008 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources