Emergency Department compression ultrasound to diagnose proximal deep vein thrombosis
- PMID: 11207402
- DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(00)00302-4
Emergency Department compression ultrasound to diagnose proximal deep vein thrombosis
Abstract
Emergency Department (ED) patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) require an objective vascular study such as ultrasound (US) to confirm the diagnosis prior to treatment or disposition. A simple compression US test of the common femoral vein and popliteal vein reliably detects proximal DVT in symptomatic patients. Application of compression US in the ED by Emergency Physicians (EPs) has been tested in a single previous study. We evaluated the ability of ED compression US, performed by EPs, to diagnose proximal DVT as compared to duplex US performed in a vascular laboratory. A prospective, observational study was conducted on a convenience sample of patients presenting to an ED with lower extremity symptoms and signs suggestive of DVT. Patients with a history of DVT in the symptomatic extremity were excluded. Final diagnosis of DVT was made by color-flow duplex US performed in a vascular laboratory. ED compression US was performed by one of six EP sonographers. In compression US, DVT was diagnosed by the inability to compress the common femoral vein or popliteal vein. The examination was considered indeterminate if the veins could not be clearly identified or compressibility was equivocal. For statistical analysis, an indeterminate examination was considered positive. In those cases where ED compression US was discordant with duplex US, and not indeterminate, we retrospectively reviewed the US findings. There were 76 patients who completed the study, and 18 patients (24%) were diagnosed with DVT by duplex US, among whom ED compression US was positive in 14, negative in 2, and indeterminate in 2. Among 58 patients diagnosed without DVT by duplex US, there were 4 false-positive ED compression US examinations and 10 indeterminate examinations. In all, ED compression US was indeterminate in 12 patients (15.8%). Compared to duplex US, ED compression US had a sensitivity of 88.9% (95% C.I. 65.3-98.6%) and specificity of 75.9% (62.8-86.1). Negative predictive value was 95.7% (85.2-99.5). Among ED patients with the clinical diagnosis of possible DVT, negative ED compression US greatly reduces the likelihood of DVT, such that discharge and outpatient follow-up can be considered. Because of limited specificity, positive results require confirmation, but may justify immediate treatment pending follow-up testing. Indeterminate results can be expected in a significant number of patients and mandate further testing prior to disposition.
Comment in
-
Emergency department compression ultrasound to diagnose proximal deep vein thrombosis.J Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;21(4):444-5. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(01)00414-0. J Emerg Med. 2001. PMID: 11728781 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Compression ultrasonography of the lower extremity with portable vascular ultrasonography can accurately detect deep venous thrombosis in the emergency department.Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;56(6):601-10. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.07.010. Epub 2010 Sep 22. Ann Emerg Med. 2010. PMID: 20864215
-
Mistakes and Pitfalls Associated with Two-Point Compression Ultrasound for Deep Vein Thrombosis.West J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;17(2):201-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.1.29335. Epub 2016 Mar 2. West J Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 26973753 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between two-point and three-point compression ultrasound for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Jan;45(1):99-105. doi: 10.1007/s11239-017-1595-9. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018. PMID: 29243193
-
Emergency Department Management of Suspected Calf-Vein Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Diagnostic Algorithm.West J Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;17(4):384-90. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.5.29951. Epub 2016 Jun 28. West J Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 27429688 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pathophysiology and diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.Semin Nucl Med. 2001 Apr;31(2):90-101. doi: 10.1053/snuc.2001.21406. Semin Nucl Med. 2001. PMID: 11330789 Review.
Cited by
-
Cardiac and vascular point-of-care ultrasound: current situation, problems, and future prospects.J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022 Oct;49(4):601-608. doi: 10.1007/s10396-021-01166-3. Epub 2022 Jan 8. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022. PMID: 34997377 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnostics: gleaning insights from point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) techniques in emergencies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound J. 2024 Jul 30;16(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13089-024-00378-1. Ultrasound J. 2024. PMID: 39080184 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Three-point Compression Ultrasonography Performed by Emergency Medicine Resident for the Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis: a Prospective Diagnostic Study.Acta Inform Med. 2019 Jun;27(2):119-122. doi: 10.5455/aim.2019.27.119-122. Acta Inform Med. 2019. PMID: 31452570 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of three-point compression ultrasound for the diagnosis of proximal deep-vein thrombosis in emergency department.J Res Med Sci. 2019 Sep 30;24:80. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_1057_18. eCollection 2019. J Res Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 31620179 Free PMC article.
-
Resident performed two-point compression ultrasound is inadequate for diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in the critically III.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014 Apr;37(3):298-302. doi: 10.1007/s11239-013-0945-5. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014. PMID: 23722715 Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical