Reply to P. Vargas letter to the editor: Comparative evaluation of the Misgav Ladach cesarean section with two traditional techniques. The first four years' experience (published in volume 80, 1)

Free article

Comment

D Ayres-de-Campos. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Mar.

Free article

. 2001 Mar;80(3):285.

doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080003285.x.

No abstract available

Comment on

The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel method.
Darj E, Nordström ML. Darj E, et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999 Jan;78(1):37-41. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999. PMID: 9926890 Clinical Trial.
The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description.
Holmgren G, Sjöholm L, Stark M. Holmgren G, et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999 Aug;78(7):615-21. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999. PMID: 10422908
Comparative evaluation of the Misgav Ladach cesarean section with two traditional techniques. The first four years' experience.
Varga P, Bódis J. Varga P, et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Jan;80(1):90-2. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800119.x. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001. PMID: 11167198 No abstract available.