NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures
- PMID: 11214977
NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures
Abstract
A new procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids (National Acoustic Laboratories' nonlinear fitting procedure, version 1 [NAL-NL1]) is described. The rationale is to maximize speech intelligibility while constraining loudness to be normal or less. Speech intelligibility is predicted by the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII), which has been modified to account for the reduction in performance associated with increasing degrees of hearing loss, especially at high frequencies. Prescriptions are compared for the NAL-NL1, desired sensation level [input/output], FIG6, and a threshold version of the Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum procedures. For an average speech input level, the NAL-NL1 prescriptions are very similar to those of the well-established NAL-Revised, Profound procedure. Compared with the other procedures, NAL-NL1 prescribes less low-frequency gain for flat and upward sloping audiograms. It prescribes less high-frequency gain for steeply sloping high-frequency hearing losses. NAL-NL1 tends to prescribe less compression than the other procedures. All procedures differ considerably from one another for some audiograms.
Similar articles
-
Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Mar;26(3):260-74. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.3.6. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015. PMID: 25751694
-
Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.Ear Hear. 2001 Dec;22(6):501-15. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200112000-00006. Ear Hear. 2001. PMID: 11770672
-
A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):441-59. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.7.5. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011. PMID: 21993050
-
NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.Trends Amplif. 2012 Dec;16(4):211-23. doi: 10.1177/1084713812468511. Epub 2012 Nov 30. Trends Amplif. 2012. PMID: 23203416 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fitting hearing aids to adults using prescriptive methods: an evidence-based review of effectiveness.J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(7):448-60. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.7.5. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005. PMID: 16295232 Review.
Cited by
-
Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jun 4;64(6):2053-2069. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00481. Epub 2021 May 21. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021. PMID: 34019777 Free PMC article.
-
Test Administration Methods and Cognitive Test Scores in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.Gerontology. 2020;66(1):24-32. doi: 10.1159/000500777. Epub 2019 Jun 26. Gerontology. 2020. PMID: 31242497 Free PMC article.
-
Real-time loudness normalisation with combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0195412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195412. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29617421 Free PMC article.
-
Listening to Music Through Hearing Aids: Potential Lessons for Cochlear Implants.Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165211072969. doi: 10.1177/23312165211072969. Trends Hear. 2022. PMID: 35179052 Free PMC article.
-
Speech-Identification During Standing as a Multitasking Challenge for Young, Middle-Aged and Older Adults.Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241260621. doi: 10.1177/23312165241260621. Trends Hear. 2024. PMID: 39053897 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical