Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Nov;38(6):603-9.
doi: 10.1007/BF02344864.

Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method

J S Kim et al. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000 Nov.

Abstract

Femoral neck anteversion is the torsion of the femoral head with reference to the distal femur. Conventional methods that use cross-sectional computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance or ultrasound images to estimate femoral anteversion have met with several problems owing to the complex, three-dimensional (3D) structure of the femur. These problems include not only the difficulty of defining the direction of the femoral neck axis and condylar line but also the dependency upon patient positioning. In particular, the femoral neck axis, the direction of the femoral head, known as the major source of error, is difficult to determine from either a single or several two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional images. A new method has been devised for the measurement of femoral anteversion using the 3D imaging technique. 3D reconstructed CT images from the femoral head and trochanter to the distal femur are used to measure the anteversion. It is necessary to remove the soft tissue from the CT images and extract just the bone part. Then, the femoral anteversion is measured from a computer-rendered femur image. The 3D imaging method is compared with both the conventional 2D method and the physical method using 20 dried femurs. For the physical method, which is used as a reference value, a special apparatus is devised. The average difference between the results of the physical method and those of the 2D CT method is 5.33 degrees. The average difference between the results of the physical method and those of the 3D imaging method is 0.45 degrees. Seventy-four patients, who suffer from toe-in-gait disease, are tested to compare the 3D imaging method with the conventional 2D CT method. The average difference between the 2D and 3D methods is 8.6 degrees, and the standard is 7.43 degrees. This method provides a very accurate and reliable measurement of femoral anteversion, as it is virtually equivalent to the direct measurement of bisected dried femur in vitro.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1954;110:1-80 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Jul;69(6):873-80 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Oct;69(8):1169-76 - PubMed
    1. Isr J Med Sci. 1980 Apr;16(4):288-94 - PubMed
    1. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1984;25(3):209-15 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources