Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: a 15-year follow-up study
- PMID: 11218510
- DOI: 10.1007/s007840050107
Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: a 15-year follow-up study
Abstract
This study deals with 4971 implants (Brånemark system) installed in 1315 patients, either fully or partially edentulous, and followed from implant installation up to the last control. A predominance of female patients (61%) and a nearly equal number of upper and lower jaws characterised the study group. Patients were scheduled each 6-12 months for recall. The observation time varied from 0.5 to 15 years (mean 5.1). The whole cohort was split up into compromised (n = 59) and non-compromised (n = 1256) patients. The former are defined as grafted (autologous bone) and patients irradiated in the head and neck area. In the compromised patients 24 out of 59 patients (40.6%) showed failures, in whom 59 out of 310 (19%) implants failed. In the non-compromised patients, implant failures were observed in 11.6% of the patients, which corresponds to 5.9% of the installed implants, excluding iatrogenic failures. Failures were further divided chronologically into early (up to 1 year after abutment connection) and late failures. There were early implant failures in 12.5% of the compromised patients and in 3.4% of the others. Late implant failures occurred in 7.4 and 2% of the two patients groups, respectively. While gender did not affect the failure rate, implant lengths, corresponding to the available bone height did, since a 21.5% failure rate for the 7-mm implants contrasts with 4.1 and 3.8% for 13- and 15-mm implants, respectively. Early as well as annual late failures are more frequently found in the maxilla. Implant fractures only occurred in the fixed (both partial and full) prosthesis group but never surpassed the 0.2% annual level. Marginal bone loss, exceeding the third screw thread occurred in 1.8% of the implants at the last control. It appears that this type of implant configuration offers a high long-term predictability. Failures occur before, at or during the first year after abutment connection and in very short implants. Marginal bone as a whole is very stable over the years.
Similar articles
-
Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology.Eur J Oral Sci. 1998 Feb;106(1):527-51. doi: 10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-2-.x. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998. PMID: 9527353
-
Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: One-year post-loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016 Spring;9(1):35-45. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016. PMID: 27022635 Clinical Trial.
-
One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Jul-Aug;12(4):454-62. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997. PMID: 9274074 Clinical Trial.
-
Changes in Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level by Jaw Location: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 4970 Implants.J Oral Implantol. 2023 Aug 1;49(4):444-455. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-22-00252. J Oral Implantol. 2023. PMID: 37527152
-
On marginal bone level changes around dental implants.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Apr;23(2):159-169. doi: 10.1111/cid.12970. Epub 2021 Jan 18. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021. PMID: 33463007 Review.
Cited by
-
Latest Trends in Surface Modification for Dental Implantology: Innovative Developments and Analytical Applications.Pharmaceutics. 2022 Feb 21;14(2):455. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020455. Pharmaceutics. 2022. PMID: 35214186 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Metagenomic analysis of the peri-implant and periodontal microflora in patients with clinical signs of gingivitis or mucositis.Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Jun;16(3):843-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0561-8. Epub 2011 May 3. Clin Oral Investig. 2012. PMID: 21538072
-
Prosthetic rehabilitation in post-oncological patients: Report of two cases.Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2010 Jan;1(1):19-25. Epub 2010 Jun 29. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2010. PMID: 22238701 Free PMC article.
-
Three-Year Retrospective Comparative Study between Implants with Same Body-Design but Different Crest Module Configurations.Dent J (Basel). 2020 Dec 15;8(4):135. doi: 10.3390/dj8040135. Dent J (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33333998 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of superhydrophilic surfaces of dental implants - a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2019 May 10;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0767-8. BMC Oral Health. 2019. PMID: 31077190 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources