Genetic potential of interfacial guided osteogenesis in implant devices
- PMID: 11219100
- DOI: 10.4012/dmj.19.99
Genetic potential of interfacial guided osteogenesis in implant devices
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to summarise recent advances in the design and composition of bioactive surface layers of implantabile biomaterials, and thus the genetic potential of osteoprogenitor cells to recognize and respond to these diverse implanted biomaterials. Changes applied to a biomaterial's surface, in general, could improve its biocompatibility, osseointegration and durability properties, which are required for long-term implantation in the living body. In this review, the implant-bone interface was evaluated and interpreted on the basis of osteoblast cell cultures, i.e., on the genetic potential of osteoblasts to express different phenotype markers depending on the type of biomaterials used. The interface formed by in vitro-grown osteoblasts may be used to identify components of the in vivo implant-bone interface. Over the years, a large number of implant systems consisting of many different biomaterials have been introduced in dentistry and orthopaedics. This paper discusses the performance of currently used metals and other biomaterials, by focusing on the events which occur immediately after implantation and on their impact on the bone-implant interface. The review demonstrates that continuous improvements in composition, surface modality and design of implants may benefit osseointegration and clinical longevity of such implants. No load-bearing conditions or clinical status are discussed. Titanium (Ti) and calcium phosphate ceramics are regarded as the most biocompatible synthetic substances known to be used in hard tissue implantation. These biomaterials are osteoconductive, and do not induce ectopic bone formation. Nonetheless, they provide a physical matrix which is suitable for the deposition of new bone and may guide both the growth and extension of the bone. Comparative investigation evaluated that Ti implant systems appear to be apposed by more bone than ceramic systems, although alternatives concerning the type of Ti alloy and bioactive surface layer engineering, generate extremely diverse osseointegration results. Manufacturers have created an extensive range of inorganic or ceramic coatings on Ti implants in order to achieve better bone healing and osteoconduction. Biologically active molecules, added to the implant surface, represent breakthroughs in guided interfacial osteogenesis. This methodology offers an enormous potential of genetic controlling and promoting osteogenesis. The bone growth factors are not fully understood, but most researchers agree that the contact between the bioactive surface layer of the implant and bone is not static but dynamic and that the above factors may maximise the implant osseointegration.
Similar articles
-
In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.J Dent. 2012 Apr;40(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jan 28. J Dent. 2012. PMID: 22307025
-
Sphene ceramics for orthopedic coating applications: an in vitro and in vivo study.Acta Biomater. 2009 Oct;5(8):3192-204. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.028. Epub 2009 May 4. Acta Biomater. 2009. PMID: 19457458
-
Impact of rhBMP-2 on regeneration of buccal alveolar defects during the osseointegration of transgingival inserted implants.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Oct;108(4):e3-e12. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.025. Epub 2009 Aug 28. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009. PMID: 19716715
-
Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.Micron. 2005;36(7-8):630-44. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Sep 6. Micron. 2005. PMID: 16182543 Review.
-
Ion-Doped Silicate Bioceramic Coating of Ti-Based Implant.Iran Biomed J. 2016 Sep;20(4):189-200. doi: 10.7508/ibj.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Mar 16. Iran Biomed J. 2016. PMID: 26979401 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Electrochemical coating of dental implants with anodic porous titania for enhanced osteointegration.Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2015 Nov 20;6:2183-92. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.6.224. eCollection 2015. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2015. PMID: 26665091 Free PMC article.
-
Nerve growth factor beta(NGF beta) delivery via a collagen/hydroxyapatite (Col/HAp) composite and its effects on new bone ingrowth.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003 Feb;14(2):95-102. doi: 10.1023/a:1022099208535. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003. PMID: 15348479
-
Histologic evaluation and removal torque analysis of nano- and microtreated titanium implants in the dogs.J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 Jul;1(2):75-84. doi: 10.4047/jap.2009.1.2.75. Epub 2009 Jul 31. J Adv Prosthodont. 2009. PMID: 21165259 Free PMC article.
-
Pulsed electromagnetic fields preserve bone architecture and mechanical properties and stimulate porous implant osseointegration by promoting bone anabolism in type 1 diabetic rabbits.Osteoporos Int. 2018 May;29(5):1177-1191. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4392-1. Epub 2018 Mar 9. Osteoporos Int. 2018. PMID: 29523929
-
Titanium Implant Osseointegration Problems with Alternate Solutions Using Epoxy/Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Composite.Metals (Basel). 2014 Dec;4(4):549-569. doi: 10.3390/met4040549. Metals (Basel). 2014. PMID: 25635227 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources