Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Mar;37(3):251-8.
doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.113703.

Outpatient treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a clinical care pathway managed by the emergency department

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Outpatient treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a clinical care pathway managed by the emergency department

D R Vinson et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

Study objective: We evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an outpatient clinical care pathway for the initial treatment of acute proximal lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) managed by the emergency department of 2 affiliated community hospitals.

Methods: This observational, retrospectively defined, population-based study with 39(1/2) months of preintervention analysis and 32(1/2) months of postintervention analysis was conducted in 2 suburban EDs of a large group model health maintenance organization. Our outpatient DVT clinical care pathway used careful patient selection and multidisciplinary follow-up. Ninety-six patients before the intervention and 178 patients after the intervention met eligibility criteria for the pathway. Adverse events during the first 2 weeks of treatment included symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), progressive DVT, minor and major bleeding, and death.

Results: Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. Five (5.2%) of 96 preintervention subjects (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4 to 8.1) developed adverse events compared with 5 (2.8%) of 178 postintervention subjects (95% CI 1.5 to 4.1; difference between groups 2.4%; P =.50). In each group, 1 (1.0% versus 0.6%) subject developed a PE, 2 (2.1% versus 1.1%) developed progressive symptoms of progressive DVT, and 2 (2.1% versus 1.1%) developed minor bleeding. Major bleeding occurred in 1 (1.0%) preintervention subject and no postintervention subjects. No patient in either cohort died.

Conclusion: Managed by the ED, an outpatient DVT clinical care pathway using careful patient selection and an integrated multidisciplinary approach can provide a similar degree of effectiveness and safety as customary inpatient therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources