Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Mar;72(3):215-21.
doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00337-4.

Oral misoprostol vs. placebo in the management of prelabor rupture of membranes at term

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Oral misoprostol vs. placebo in the management of prelabor rupture of membranes at term

R A Hoffmann et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of oral misoprostol for the induction of labor (IOL) in women with prelabor rupture of membranes at term (PROM) and to monitor maternal or fetal complications.

Method: This randomized, placebo controlled trial was performed in a secondary referral hospital. The data of 47 patients in the misoprostol--and 49 patients in the placebo group was available for analysis. The former received 100 microg misoprostol orally, repeated once after 6 h if not in active labor, the latter received two doses of vitamin C also after a 6-h interval. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for analysis.

Results: The median treatment to delivery interval in the misoprostol group was 7.5 h and 25 h in the placebo group (P<0.001). No significant differences were found in the incidence of abnormalities on the cardiotocograph, mode of delivery, neonatal outcome, use of antibiotics for the mothers and patient acceptability.

Conclusion: Oral misoprostol in the suggested dose is an effective and cheap alternative for IOL in patients with PROM. No adverse effects could be demonstrated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources