Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):519-23.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.519.

Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey

Affiliations

Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey

B Hanley et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the extent to which consumers are involved in the work of clinical trial coordinating centres in the United Kingdom and the nature of consumers' involvement in randomised trials coordinated by these centres.

Design: National surveys using structured questionnaires with some open ended sections.

Setting: 103 clinical trial coordinating centres in the United Kingdom identified through a database assembled in 1997 by the NHS clinical trials adviser.

Participants: Named contacts at 62 coordinating centres and investigators in 60 trials that were identified as involving consumers.

Main outcome measures: Number of coordinating centres and number of trials in which consumers were involved and the nature of consumers' involvement.

Results: Of the 62 eligible centres, 23 reported that consumers had already been involved in their work, and most respondents were positive about this involvement. 17 centres planned to involve consumers. 15 centres had no plans to involve consumers, but only four of these considered such involvement irrelevant. Responses from investigators about the 48 individual trials were mostly positive, with respondents commenting that input from consumers had helped refine research questions, improve the quality of patient information, and make the trial more relevant to the needs of patients.

Conclusions: Consumer involvement in the design and conduct of controlled trials seems to be growing and seems to be welcomed by most researchers. Such involvement seems likely to improve the relevance to consumers of the questions addressed and the results obtained in controlled trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Grant-Pearce C, Miles I, Hills P. Mismatches in priorities for health research between professionals and consumers. Manchester: Policy Research in Engineering, Science and Technology, University of Manchester; 1998.
    1. Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet. 2000;355:2037–2040. - PubMed
    1. Marlin A, Redman S, Clarke C, Clark R, Boyle F. Kings Cross, NSW: NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre; 1996. Breast cancer research in Australia: current research and future priorities.
    1. Chalmers I. What do I want from health researchers and research when I am a patient? BMJ. 1995;310:1315–1318. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goodare H, Lockwood S. Involving patients in clinical research. BMJ. 1999;319:724–725. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types