Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy
- PMID: 11230639
- DOI: 10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr27679
Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate and compare human observer performance in a contrast-detail test by using postprocessed hard-copy images from a digital chest radiography system and conventional screen-film radiographs.
Materials and methods: The digital radiography system is based on a large-area flat-panel x-ray detector with a structured cesium iodide scintillator layer and an amorphous silicon thin-film transistor array for image readout. Images of a contrast-detail phantom were acquired at two exposure levels by using two standard thoracic screen-film systems and the digital system at matched dose. By using images of the phantom processed with standard chest image postprocessing techniques, a four-alternative forced-choice observer perception study was performed, and the number of detectable test signals (disk-shaped objects 0.3-4.0 mm in diameter) was determined for each image type.
Results: On average, observers detected more test signals on digital images than on screen-film radiographs at all diameters up to 2.0 mm and an equivalent number at larger diameters. Test signals with lower inherent subject contrast were detected more readily on digital images than on screen-film images, even when x-ray exposure levels for the digital system were reduced by 20%.
Conclusion: Observer performance in a contrast-detail detection task can be improved by using images acquired with the flat-panel digital chest radiography system as compared with those acquired with state-of-the-art screen-film combinations.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images.IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Mar;20(3):239-42. doi: 10.1109/42.918474. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001. PMID: 11341713
-
Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Oct;181(4):923-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.4.1810923. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003. PMID: 14500203
-
Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Feb;178(2):481-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.2.1780481. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002. PMID: 11804922
-
Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.Acta Radiol Suppl. 2002 Mar;43(427):1-43. Acta Radiol Suppl. 2002. PMID: 12108231 Review.
-
Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature.Eur Radiol. 2004 May;14(5):827-34. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2243-2. Epub 2004 Feb 17. Eur Radiol. 2004. PMID: 14968260 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of a noise reduction procedure for chest radiography.Yonago Acta Med. 2013 Dec;56(4):85-91. Epub 2013 Nov 28. Yonago Acta Med. 2013. PMID: 24574577 Free PMC article.
-
Image quality and radiation dose in planar imaging - Image quality figure of merits from the CDRAD phantom.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jul;20(7):151-159. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12649. Epub 2019 Jun 1. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019. PMID: 31152576 Free PMC article.
-
Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.Eur Radiol. 2006 Jul;16(7):1544-50. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0077-1. Epub 2006 Jan 11. Eur Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16404566 Clinical Trial.
-
Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size.Radiology. 2007 Jul;244(1):130-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2441060977. Epub 2007 May 23. Radiology. 2007. PMID: 17522348 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources