Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jan;86(1):179-85.
doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.1.7118.

Effects of contraceptive use on bone biochemical markers in young women

Affiliations

Effects of contraceptive use on bone biochemical markers in young women

S M Ott et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Jan.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare biochemical markers of bone resorption and formation in young women using different hormonal contraceptive methods. Women aged 18-39 yr who were using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) contraception were recruited for the study; comparison women were matched by age and clinic location. There were 116 women using DMPA, 39 using oral contraceptives containing estrogen and progestin, and 72 not currently using hormonal contraceptives. Biochemical measurements were serum calcium, PTH and osteocalcin, and urine N-telopeptide. Bone density was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The N-telopeptide levels, adjusted for age and other risk factors, were 42.4 +/- 2.3 nmol/mmol creatinine in the DMPA group, 26.2 +/- 3.3 nmol/mmol in the oral contraceptive group, and 35.4 +/- 2.9 nmol/mmol in the nonusers; significant differences were seen in all pairwise comparisons. Osteocalcin levels showed the same pattern, although the difference between the DMPA users and nonusers was not statistically significant. There were no differences among groups in the PTH levels. The bone density at the spine was 1.086 +/- 0.085 g/cm(2) in the DMPA group, 1.103 +/- 0.095 g/cm(2) in the oral contraceptive group, and 1.093 +/- 0.090 g/cm(2) in nonusers (P = 0.051). The results suggest that in women using DMPA bone resorption exceeded bone formation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources