Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001;73(1):38-41.

[Comparison of carvedilol and atenolol efficacy in patients with stable effort angina]

[Article in Russian]
  • PMID: 11234138
Clinical Trial

[Comparison of carvedilol and atenolol efficacy in patients with stable effort angina]

[Article in Russian]
S Iu Martsevich et al. Ter Arkh. 2001.

Abstract

Aim: To compare effectiveness of carvedilol--beta-adrenoblocker with vasodilating action--with atenolol which is beta-adrenoblocker having no vasodilating activity in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with stable effort angina.

Material and methods: The trial entered 28 CHD patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI). All the patients had no contraindications to beta-adrenoblockers, had positive exercise tolerance test. After the control period of 7-10 days the patients received either carvedilol (14 patients) or atenolol (14 patients) in a mean daily dose 20.5 mg (6.25 to 50 mg) and 25.9 mg (12.5 to 100 mg), respectively, twice a day. The course of the treatment took 4 weeks. The effect was evaluated at treadmill exercise test.

Results: Both drugs diminished heart rate, carvedilol was less effective in this respect. Both drugs significantly prolonged time of exercise to the anginal attack and ST depression by 1.0 mm. Side effects arose in 6 and 4 patients, respectively.

Conclusion: Carvedilol and atenolol are equally effective in the treatment of stable effort angina.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources