Colorectal cancer screening in Massachusetts: measuring compliance with current guidelines
- PMID: 11234181
Colorectal cancer screening in Massachusetts: measuring compliance with current guidelines
Abstract
Context: Professional organizations have published guidelines for colorectal cancer screening. Defining which patients are currently, or should be, screened is an important clinical and public health issue.
Objective: To document the prevalence of colorectal cancer screening and profile the tests patients have had. DESIGN/POPULATION: A random-digit telephone survey of Massachusetts adults, 50 years of age and older.
Outcome measures: Percentage of persons ever and currently tested by fecal occult blood tests, flexible sigmoidoscopy, barium enema, colonoscopy, or some combination of these tests.
Results: Sixty-five percent of those contacted agreed to the telephone interview. Approximately 29% of the 1119 respondents had never had any currently accepted test, including 10% who reported having only a fecal occult blood test done in a provider's office and 19% who reported having no tests. At least 51% were currently tested by one or more tests for screening, diagnosis, or both. Another 10% were possibly current by colonoscopy or barium enema, both of which can be ordered for screening but are more commonly used to evaluate a problem, such as rectal bleeding, or for surveillance after identification of a polyp or other abnormality. An additional 11% had been tested at some point but were not current according to guidelines.
Conclusions: Accurate assessment of rates of colorectal cancer screening is complex because of the multiple acceptable screening methods, the fact that patients may be tested for screening or diagnostic purposes, and the lack of adequate systems for tracking such testing. For accurate measurement, all methods must be assessed regardless of whether tests were ordered for screening, diagnosis, or surveillance.
Comment in
-
Colorectal cancer screening: keeping the options open.Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Jan-Feb;4(1):39-41. Eff Clin Pract. 2001. PMID: 11234185 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Colorectal cancer test use--Maryland, 2002-2006.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007 Sep 14;56(36):932-6. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007. PMID: 17851446
-
Utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests: a 1997 survey of Massachusetts internists.Prev Med. 2001 Nov;33(5):381-91. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0903. Prev Med. 2001. PMID: 11676578
-
The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs.Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 13;166(20):2202-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.20.2202. Arch Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 17101937
-
Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: current standards and future trends.Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Jun;13(6):768-75. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.087. Epub 2006 Apr 12. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16604473 Review.
-
Colorectal cancer: risk factors and recommendations for early detection.Am Fam Physician. 1999 Jun;59(11):3083-92. Am Fam Physician. 1999. PMID: 10392591 Review.
Cited by
-
Colorectal cancer screening participation: comparisons with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening.Am J Public Health. 2001 Aug;91(8):1264-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.8.1264. Am J Public Health. 2001. PMID: 11499116 Free PMC article.
-
Correlates of initiating colorectal cancer screening beginning at age 50.J Community Health. 2013 Feb;38(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9574-8. J Community Health. 2013. PMID: 22692444
-
Collaborative colorectal cancer screening: a successful quality improvement initiative.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2003 Jul;16(3):341-4. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2003.11927922. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2003. PMID: 16278706 Free PMC article.
-
Factors explaining racial/ethnic disparities in rates of physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening.Am J Public Health. 2013 Jul;103(7):e91-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301034. Epub 2013 May 16. Am J Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23678899 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical