Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 May;9(3):225-230.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1999.99029.x.

Cisplatin, radiation, and amifostine in carcinoma of the uterine cervix

Affiliations

Cisplatin, radiation, and amifostine in carcinoma of the uterine cervix

D. Gallardo et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1999 May.

Abstract

A pilot, open, comparative study was performed on patients with locally advanced cervical cancer to investigate the efficacy and safety of amifostine. Twenty patients with a histologic diagnosis of squamous cervical cancer were treated with radiotherapy and randomized in two groups. Group A received cisplatin at 20 mg/m2 for five days in two cycles during intracavitary radiotherapy and 100 mg/m2 x 2 cycles during external radiotherapy, and amifostine 825 mg/m2 15 min before the cisplatin infusion. Patients in group B received cisplatin in the same doses without amifostine. All patients had complete responses during a median follow-up of 20 months. Grade three neutropenia was present in two patients in group A and in four of the control group, P = 0.31; grade 2 neurologic toxicity was seen in four patients in group B and in one of the patients in group A, P = 0.15. One patient needed temporary interruption of amifostine due to hypotension. Eight of 10 patients in group A developed hypocalcemia during the treatment with amifostine. Our findings indicate that amifostine was well tolerated. In this series a mild neurologic and hematologic protection was found in patients that received amifostine, although this was not statistically significant. No differences in disease-free survival response and overall survival was seen between the two groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources