Comparison of myocardial fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound for the assessment of slotted-tube stents
- PMID: 11246245
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1074
Comparison of myocardial fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound for the assessment of slotted-tube stents
Abstract
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been reported to provide similar results for assessment of coil stent deployment. Their relative value in slotted-tube stents has not been investigated. Fourteen patients subjected to coronary angioplasty and IVUS-guided elective stenting with a slotted-tube stent underwent IVUS assessment and FFR measurement following stent implantation at inflation pressures of 12 and 18 atm. FFR values (mean +/- SD) preangioplasty, postangioplasty, and poststenting at 12 atm and 18 atm, were 0.58 +/- 0.07, 0.83 +/- 0.05, 0.94 +/- 0.02, and 0.94 +/- 0.02, respectively. After inflation at 12 atm, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the concordance of IVUS and FFR measurements was 0.89 (P = 0.02). Six patients had either an abnormal IVUS (n = 2) or FFR < 0.94 (n = 1) or both abnormal IVUS and FFR < 0.94 (n = 3) after the first inflation and had a second inflation at 18 atm. The area under the ROC curve for the concordance between IVUS and FFR final measurements was 0.855 (P = 0.10). Perfect concordance between IVUS and FFR was seen only for FFR values less than 0.91 or larger than 0.94. Overall, IVUS and FFR have substantial concordance with respect to slotted-tube stent deployment. However, FFR values between 0.91 and 0.94 after inflation are difficult to interpret.
Similar articles
-
Discrepancy between morphologic and functional criteria of optimal stent deployment using intravascular ultrasound and pressure derived myocardial fractional flow reserve.Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2005;7(2):101-7. doi: 10.1080/14628840510039540. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2005. PMID: 16093220
-
Fractional flow reserve compared with intravascular ultrasound guidance for optimizing stent deployment.Circulation. 2001 Oct 16;104(16):1917-22. doi: 10.1161/hc4101.097539. Circulation. 2001. PMID: 11602494 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomised trial of endoluminal reconstruction comparing the NIR stent and the Wallstent in angioplasty of long segment coronary disease: results of the RENEWAL Study.Am Heart J. 2001 Jun;141(6):971-6. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.115301. Am Heart J. 2001. PMID: 11376312 Clinical Trial.
-
Digital enhancement of stent images in primary and secondary percutaneous coronary revascularisation.EuroIntervention. 2009 May;5 Suppl D:D101-6. EuroIntervention. 2009. PMID: 19736057 Review.
-
Provisional stenting strategies: systematic overview and implications for clinical decision-making.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Oct;36(4):1142-51. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00854-8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 11028463 Review.
Cited by
-
Coronary pressure measurement based decision making for percutaneous coronary intervention.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2009 Nov;5(4):323-33. doi: 10.2174/157340309789317832. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2009. PMID: 21037849 Free PMC article.
-
A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.Clin Cardiol. 2020 May;43(5):414-422. doi: 10.1002/clc.23342. Epub 2020 Feb 10. Clin Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32037592 Free PMC article.
-
Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR).Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 1;42(45):4656-4668. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab449. Eur Heart J. 2021. PMID: 34279606 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous