Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Apr;60(4):344-8.
doi: 10.1136/ard.60.4.344.

Does the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire have potential as a monitoring tool for subjects with rheumatoid arthritis?

Affiliations

Does the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire have potential as a monitoring tool for subjects with rheumatoid arthritis?

M C Greenwood et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To assist in the interpretation of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score changes for individual patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), by determining the minimum size of score change that can confidently be considered to reflect a significant change in disability from the patient's perspective.

Method: HAQ score changes were calculated for 40 clinic patients with RA who had reported no change to health in general over two months. These were considered to reflect both inconsistencies in questionnaire completion and any true but minor changes not considered significant enough by the patients to represent a change to their health in general. HAQ score changes over one year were also calculated for 207 clinic patients with RA.

Results: The range within which 95% of score changes would be expected to lie in the absence of significant change was estimated as +/-0.48 points (+/-2SD of the score changes) and 80% within +/-0.31 points (+/-1.29SD). A chi(2) test showed no significant association between an HAQ score increase of >0.31 over one year and decline in health related to arthritis reported by the patient over the same period.

Conclusion: As a general guideline, an HAQ score needs to change by 0.48 points or more for 95% confidence that it reflects significant change (0.31 for 80% confidence). Although the value of HAQ as a group outcome measure is well established, this study questions the usefulness of monitoring individual HAQ scores in a clinical setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score differences over two months—40 patients with rheumatoid arthritis reporting no change in health in general.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Size and direction of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score change was not related to position on the scale. HAQ score changes over two months (with no patient perceived change in health in general) plotted against the midpoint between the two scores of each subject.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box plots of annual Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score changes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) attending for routine outcome assessment (excluding 19 who reported change not related to their arthritis). The box plots show the median, the upper and lower quartiles (upper and lower edges of the box), the range excluding outliers (whiskers), and outliers (small circles). The dashed lines indicate the calculated limits within which 80% of differences would be expected to lie based on the score changes over two months for no patient perceived change in health in general.

Comment in

  • Usefulness of the HAQ in the clinic.
    Wolfe F, Pincus T, Fries JF. Wolfe F, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Aug;60(8):811. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.8.811. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001. PMID: 11482307 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Jul;33(7):682-5 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 1990 May;17(5):609-13 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Care Res. 1992 Sep;5(3):130-6 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 1999 Apr;26(4):800-4 - PubMed