Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: comparison of two surgical approaches
- PMID: 11248616
- DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01065-7
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: comparison of two surgical approaches
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the complications, hospital stay, and functional results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic (RL) pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty (OP) with a minimal subcostal incision.
Methods: From October 1997 to January 2000, 53 consecutive nonrandomized patients underwent 26 RL pyeloplasties, of which 1 was bilateral (group 1), and 28 OP (group 2). The decision between the two techniques depended on the patient's anesthetic ability to tolerate RL, previous ureteropelvic junction surgery, associated renal pathologic findings, and the surgeon's laparoscopic experience. Subjective outcomes as to postoperative pain and convalescence and objective findings on intravenous urography were assessed at 3 months postoperatively in both groups.
Results: The mean operating time (165 versus 145 minutes) and mean blood loss (92 versus 84 mL) were similar in both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred in either group; in group 1, 1 patient required open conversion. Postoperative complications occurred in 11.5% of group 1 and 14.3% of group 2. The mean hospital stay was 4.5 days for group 1 and 5.5 days for group 2. At 3 months, 23 patients (92%) in group 1 and 25 (89.2%) in group 2 were pain-free or improved. Intravenous urography showed a patent ureteropelvic junction in all cases and improvement of hydronephrosis in 88.5% of group 1 and 89.3% of group 2.
Conclusions: The incidence of complications, hospital stay, and functional results were equivalent for RL pyeloplasty and OP with a minimal incision, but the return to painless activity was more rapid with laparoscopy in younger patients.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Dec;83(4):169-74. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011. PMID: 22670313
-
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2037-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067180.78134.da. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12771713
-
Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):16-21; discussion 21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.031. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15245924 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Dec;12(6):401.e1-401.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 21. J Pediatr Urol. 2016. PMID: 27614698
-
Extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: initial experience in 15 cases.Urology. 2000 Jul;56(1):45-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00558-6. Urology. 2000. PMID: 10869620 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic management of hydronephrosis in children.World J Urol. 2004 Dec;22(6):415-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-004-0458-0. Epub 2004 Dec 17. World J Urol. 2004. PMID: 15605250
-
Laparoscopic management of primary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction: Single-centre experience.Arab J Urol. 2011 Dec;9(4):241-4. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Nov 12. Arab J Urol. 2011. PMID: 26579305 Free PMC article.
-
Defining the pros and cons of open, conventional laparoscopy, and robot-assisted pyeloplasty in a developing nation.Adv Urol. 2014;2014:850156. doi: 10.1155/2014/850156. Epub 2014 Feb 2. Adv Urol. 2014. PMID: 24624138 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):411-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9436-0. Surg Endosc. 2008. PMID: 17593442
-
The gold standard for the treatment of uncomplicated adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction.Can Urol Assoc J. 2008 Aug;2(4):393. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.837. Can Urol Assoc J. 2008. PMID: 18781213 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous