Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Mar;62(3):228-35.
doi: 10.1016/s0198-8859(00)00254-8.

Characterization of HLA class I specific antibodies by ELISA using solubilized antigen targets: I. Evaluation of the GTI QuikID assay and analysis of antibody patterns

Affiliations

Characterization of HLA class I specific antibodies by ELISA using solubilized antigen targets: I. Evaluation of the GTI QuikID assay and analysis of antibody patterns

A A Zachary et al. Hum Immunol. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

The development of solid phase immunoassays using solubilized HLA molecules as targets has provided a means of detecting HLA-specific antibodies that overcomes many of the shortcomings of lymphocyte based assays. We have evaluated a commercially available assay, the GTI QuikID (QID), that uses solubilized class I molecules from 40 subjects selected for their HLA phenotype, to characterize HLA-specific antibodies. We tested 595 sera from 319 subjects and compared the results obtained with QID to those obtained with cytotoxicity (CYT) and with GTI QuikScreen (QS) as well as to historic data. The correlation of QID with CYT (r = 0.54) was comparable to that between QID and QS (r = 0.60). The majority of disparities between QS and QID were apparent false negatives with QID that could be overcome by analyzing QID data at lower cutoff values. In contrast, most of the disparities between QID and CYT were false negatives in CYT due to the relatively low sensitivity of that assay. As expected, the ELISA was more sensitive (97%) than CYT (78%) but had a somewhat lower specificity (87% vs. 92%) due, most likely, to selection of sera that excluded most sera that were known to be nonspecific by CYT. Determination of antibody specificity could be achieved quickly by manual analysis of the QID data because of the way the data are presented by the manufacturer's software. Interestingly, the frequencies of different antibodies detected by ELISA differed from those detected by CYT with ELISA identifying more sera containing antibodies to both A and B locus antigens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources