Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Mar 17;322(7287):664-7.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.664.

Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal

M Holmes-Rovner  1 , H Llewellyn-Thomas, V Entwistle, A Coulter, A O'Connor, D R Rovner
Affiliations
Review

Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal

M Holmes-Rovner et al. BMJ. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Position of patient decision modules in flow of medical information
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Entwistle VA. Supporting and resourcing patient participation in treatment decision-making: some policy considerations. Health Expectations. 2000;3:77–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holmes-M, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Elwyn GJ. Moving to the mainstream. In: Edwards AGK, Elwyn GJ, eds. Evidence-based patient choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press (in press).
    1. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997;2:112–121. - PubMed
    1. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–661. - PubMed
    1. Clinical evidence. www.evidence.org (accessed June 2000).

Publication types