Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 11251497
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00168.x
Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: In 1996 a new model of maternity care characterized by continuity of midwifery care from early pregnancy through to the postpartum period was implemented for women attending Monash Medical Centre, a tertiary level obstetric service, in Melbourne, Australia. The objective of this study was to compare the new model of care with standard maternity care.
Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 1000 women who booked at the antenatal clinic and met the eligibility criteria were randomly allocated to receive continuity of midwifery care (team care) from a group of seven midwives in collaboration with obstetric staff, or care from a variety of midwives and obstetric staff (standard care). The primary outcome measures were procedures in labor, maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and length of hospital stay.
Results: Women assigned to the team care group experienced less augmentation of labor, less electronic fetal monitoring, less use of narcotic and epidural analgesia, and fewer episiotomies but more unsutured tears. Team care women stayed in hospital 7 hours less than women in standard care. More babies of standard care mothers were admitted to the special care nurseries for more than 5 days because of preterm birth, and more babies of team care mothers were admitted to the nurseries for more than 5 days with intrauterine growth retardation. No differences occurred in perinatal mortality between the two groups.
Conclusions: Continuity of midwifery care was associated with a reduction in medical procedures in labor and a shorter length of stay without compromising maternal and perinatal safety. Continuity of midwifery care is realistically achievable in a tertiary obstetric referral service.
Comment in
-
Commentary: have we yet learned about the effects of continuity of midwifery care?Birth. 2000 Sep;27(3):174-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00174.x. Birth. 2000. PMID: 11251498 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Satisfaction with team midwifery care for low- and high-risk women: a randomized controlled trial.Birth. 2003 Mar;30(1):1-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2003.00211.x. Birth. 2003. PMID: 12581034 Clinical Trial.
-
Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK.PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 6;17(10):e1003350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003350. eCollection 2020 Oct. PLoS Med. 2020. PMID: 33022010 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.BJOG. 2012 Nov;119(12):1483-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03446.x. Epub 2012 Jul 25. BJOG. 2012. PMID: 22830446 Clinical Trial.
-
A systematic review comparing continuity of midwifery care with standard maternity services.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Nov;105(11):1160-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09969.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998. PMID: 9853764
-
Cost-effectiveness of continuity of midwifery care for women with complex pregnancy: a structured review of the literature.Health Econ Rev. 2018 Dec 5;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0217-3. Health Econ Rev. 2018. PMID: 30519755 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Trends in very early discharge from hospital for newborns under midwifery care in Ontario from 2003 to 2017: a retrospective cohort study.CMAJ Open. 2020 Jun 25;8(2):E462-E468. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190165. Print 2020 Apr-Jun. CMAJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32586788 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 23;4(4):CD007019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007019.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31012954 Free PMC article.
-
Models of antenatal care to reduce and prevent preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 12;6(1):e009044. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009044. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 26758257 Free PMC article.
-
Staffing in postnatal units: is it adequate for the provision of quality care? Staff perspectives from a state-wide review of postnatal care in Victoria, Australia.BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 4;6:83. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-83. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 16817974 Free PMC article.
-
From little things, big things grow: a local approach to system-wide maternity services reform in the absence of definitive evidence.Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Sep 30;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-18. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007. PMID: 17903272 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous