The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care
- PMID: 11251748
- PMCID: PMC1495157
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00215.x
The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care
Abstract
Background: Discussions of end-of-life care should be held prior to acute, disabling events. Many barriers to having such discussions during primary care exist. These barriers include time constraints, communication difficulties, and perhaps physicians' anxiety that patients might react negatively to such discussions.
Objective: To assess the impact of discussions of advance directives on patients' satisfaction with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits.
Design: Prospective cohort study of patients enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial of the use of computers to remind primary care physicians to discuss advance directives with their elderly, chronically ill patients.
Setting: Academic primary care general internal medicine practice affiliated with an urban teaching hospital.
Participants: Six hundred eighty-six patients who were at least 75 years old, or at least 50 years old with serious underlying disease, and their 87 primary care physicians (57 residents, 30 faculty general internists) participated in the study.
Measurements and main results: We assessed patients' satisfaction with their primary care physicians and visits via interviews held in the waiting room after completed visits. Controlling for satisfaction at enrollment and physician, patient, and visit factors, discussing advance directives was associated with greater satisfaction with the physician (P =.052). At follow-up, the strongest predictor of satisfaction with the primary care visit was having previously discussed advance directives with that physician (P =.004), with a trend towards greater visit satisfaction when discussions were held during that visit (P =.069). The percentage of patients scoring a visit as "excellent" increased from 34% for visits without prior advance directive discussions to 51% for visits with such discussions (P =.003).
Conclusions: Elderly patients with chronic illnesses were more satisfied with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits when advanced directives were discussed. The improvement in visit satisfaction was substantial and persistent. This should encourage physicians to initiate such discussions to overcome communication barriers might result in reduced patient satisfaction levels.
Figures
Comment in
-
Out of darkness: shedding light on end-of-life care.J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jan;16(1):68-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.01106.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11251753 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, Ettelson LM, Emanuel EJ. Advance directives for medical care—a case for greater use. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:889–95. - PubMed
-
- President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Report on the Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decision. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1983. Publication 0-425-748.
-
- Wenger NS, Oye RK, Bellamy PE, et al. Prior capacity of patients lacking decision making ability early in hospitalization: implications for advance directive administration. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:539–43. - PubMed
-
- Gillick M. The high costs of dying: a way out. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:2134–37. - PubMed
-
- Chambers CV, Diamond JJ, Perkel RL, Lasch LA. Relationship of advance directives to hospital charges in a Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:541–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical