Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation
- PMID: 11252016
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.716
Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation
Abstract
In modelling human fertility one ideally accounts for timing of intercourse relative to ovulation. Measurement error in identifying the day of ovulation can bias estimates of fecundability parameters and attenuate estimates of covariate effects. In the absence of a single perfect marker of ovulation, several error prone markers are sometimes obtained. In this paper we propose a semi-parametric mixture model that uses multiple independent markers of ovulation to account for measurement error. The model assigns each method of assessing ovulation a distinct non-parametric error distribution, and corrects bias in estimates of day-specific fecundability. We use a Monte Carlo EM algorithm for joint estimation of (i) the error distribution for the markers, (ii) the error-corrected fertility parameters, and (iii) the couple-specific random effects. We apply the methods to data from a North Carolina fertility study to assess the magnitude of error in measures of ovulation based on urinary luteinizing hormone and metabolites of ovarian hormones, and estimate the corrected day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy. Published in 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Estimation of the day-specific probabilities of conception: current state of the knowledge and the relevance for epidemiological research.Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006 Nov;20 Suppl 1:3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00765.x. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 17061968
-
Day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation.Hum Reprod. 1999 Jul;14(7):1835-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.7.1835. Hum Reprod. 1999. PMID: 10402400
-
Modelling multiple ovulation, fertilization, and embryo loss in human fertility studies.Biostatistics. 2001 Jun;2(2):131-45. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/2.2.131. Biostatistics. 2001. PMID: 12933545
-
Prediction and detection of the fertile period: the markers.Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1995 May-Jun;40(3):139-55. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1995. PMID: 7663541 Review.
-
[Urinalysis--urine dry chemistry test, pregnancy test, ovulation prediction test, urinary albumin analysis].Rinsho Byori. 1997 Nov;Suppl:23-38. Rinsho Byori. 1997. PMID: 9508603 Review. Japanese. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Methodologic and statistical approaches to studying human fertility and environmental exposure.Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jan;112(1):87-93. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6263. Environ Health Perspect. 2004. PMID: 14698936 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stability of women's facial shape throughout the menstrual cycle.Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Apr 8;287(1924):20192910. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2910. Epub 2020 Apr 8. Proc Biol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32259474 Free PMC article.
-
Benchmark pregnancy rates and the assessment of post-coital contraceptives: an update.Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 12. Contraception. 2015. PMID: 25592079 Free PMC article.
-
Reclaiming fertility awareness methods to inform timed intercourse for HIV serodiscordant couples attempting to conceive.J Int AIDS Soc. 2015 Jan 9;18(1):19447. doi: 10.7448/IAS.18.1.19447. eCollection 2015. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015. PMID: 25579801 Free PMC article.
-
Importance of Daily Sex Hormone Measurements Within the Menstrual Cycle for Fertility Estimates in Cyclical Shifts Studies.Evol Psychol. 2020 Jan-Mar;18(1):1474704919897913. doi: 10.1177/1474704919897913. Evol Psychol. 2020. PMID: 31971000 Free PMC article.