Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Mar;51(464):200-5.

A randomised controlled trial of delayed antibiotic prescribing as a strategy for managing uncomplicated respiratory tract infection in primary care

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomised controlled trial of delayed antibiotic prescribing as a strategy for managing uncomplicated respiratory tract infection in primary care

J Dowell et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Despite evidence that uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection (cough) does not respond appreciably to antibiotics and that bacterial resistance is increasing, general practitioners (GPs) still prescribe frequently.

Aim: To assess delayed antibiotic prescribing as a strategy for reducing the unnecessary use of antibiotics for cough in primary care.

Design of study: Open randomised controlled trial of delayed versus immediate prescribing of antibiotics.

Setting: One hundred and ninety-one adult patients with uncomplicated cough in 22 Scottish practices who would have received antibiotics under the GP's usual practice were randomised to receive either an immediate prescription (92 patients) or a delayed prescription (99 patients).

Method: Delayed subjects were asked to wait a week before deciding whether to collect their prescription. Outcome measures included symptom duration, prescription uptake, patient satisfaction, patient enablement, and subsequent consultation rates. The 48 GPs who recruited patients were surveyed six months after the trial to see whether they used delayed prescribing as a part of their normal practice.

Results: Study and control groups were similar at baseline. Of the subjects in the delayed arm, 55% did not pick up their prescription. Although most patients were satisfied, more patients in the immediate arm were very satisfied with the treatment (P = 0.001) and the consultation (P = 0.03). The patients in the immediate arm were also more enabled (3.3 versus 2.4; P = 0.04), although more of them intended to consult for similar complaints in the future (85% versus 69%, P = 0.02). We were unable to detect any difference in actual consulting behaviour in the follow-up period (mean = 15 months [SD = 5 months]). Subsequently, 68% of GPs used delayed prescribing at least monthly; all gave the prescription to the patient.

Conclusion: Delayed prescribing is effective at reducing the use of antibiotics for self-limiting cough; however, patients are less satisfied and enabled as a result. Patients may be deterred from consulting rather than becoming enabled.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Sep 14;158(16):1813-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Mar;46(404):181-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):436-40 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1997 Nov 8;315(7117):1211-4 - PubMed
    1. Respir Med. 1997 Aug;91(7):427-34 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances