Randomized comparison of local versus epidural anesthesia for tension-free vaginal tape operation

Abstract

Purpose: We determine the difference between local anesthesia and epidural blockade for the tension-free vaginal tape operation.

Materials and methods: Between November 1995 and November 1997, 73 women who had genuine stress incontinence in the absence of pelvic prolapse underwent a prospective randomized study. The study was conducted using a standardized protocol for different types of anesthesia for the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. A formal pain scale was used to determine the pain score for the patients during the operation. Additionally an anxiety scale was used to measure the anxiety level of the subjects immediately after admission to the ward and before discharge from the hospital.

Results: One woman was excluded from study due to loss at followup. The comparisons of pain score, duration of procedure and anxiety level of the 2 different types of anesthesia were not significantly different in the 72 study subjects. There was no significant difference in the amount of blood loss, while initial spontaneous voiding occurred significantly earlier (3.5 +/- 2.3 versus 5.8 +/- 0.1 hours, p <0.01), the number of patients in whom initial spontaneous voiding occurred more than 6 hours postoperatively was fewer (2 versus 10, p =0.01), amount of post-void residual during hospitalization was significantly less (98 +/- 63 versus 155 +/- 56 ml., p <0.01) and length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (3.4 +/- 1.4 versus 5.5 +/- 1.6 days, p <0.01) in the local anesthesia compared to epidural group. Subjective and objective success rates were not significantly different in these 2 groups.

Conclusions: Both anesthetic methods can be equally effectively used for the tension-free vaginal tape operation. Local may be better than epidural anesthesia but its clinical significance needs to be proved by further study.