Paying for graduate medical education: the debate goes on
- PMID: 11260935
- DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.2.136
Paying for graduate medical education: the debate goes on
Abstract
The debate over Medicare payments for graduate medical education has been conducted under the premise that such payments cover the added costs of training. Standard economic theory suggests that residents bear the costs of their training, implying that the additional costs of teaching hospitals are not attributable to training per se but to some combination of a different patient care product, unmeasured case-mix differences, and the costs of clinical research. As a result, payment for the additional patient care costs at teaching hospitals should come from the Medicare trust fund; any subsidies for training should come from general revenues.
Comment in
-
Economists on academic medicine: elephants in a porcelain shop?Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Mar-Apr;20(2):148-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.2.148. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001. PMID: 11260936 No abstract available.
-
Does economic theory justify changing policy that works?Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Mar-Apr;20(2):153-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.2.153. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001. PMID: 11260937 No abstract available.
-
Another alternative for financing graduate medical education.Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Mar-Apr;20(2):156-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.2.156. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001. PMID: 11260938 No abstract available.
-
More debate on paying for GME.Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Jul-Aug;20(4):254-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.4.254. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001. PMID: 11463083 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
