Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely low birthweight infants in California
- PMID: 11268864
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200477
Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely low birthweight infants in California
Abstract
Objective: To characterize physician-parent counseling and delivery room resuscitation of extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants.
Study design: Cross-sectional survey of 473 California neonatologists detailing counseling patterns, resuscitation thresholds, and acceptance of parental decision making.
Results: The response rate was 61%. After 23 weeks' gestation, > 80% of neonatologists counseled parents expecting ELBW infants. All (> 99%) counseled parents about mortality; > 25% reported not discussing limiting resuscitation or death despite resuscitation. Decisions to limit resuscitation were affected by congenital anomalies, parents' wishes, or perceptions of pain, suffering, and quality of life. Nearly 70% of neonatologists supported parental decision making at 22 to 23 weeks, whereas 66% to 74% responded that parents should not be allowed to make nonresuscitation decisions after 26 weeks. Median resuscitation thresholds were 23 weeks (range 20-28) and 500 g (range 350-1000).
Conclusions: Neonatologists' failure to discuss nonresuscitation options, variations in resuscitation thresholds, and unwillingness to accept nonresuscitation decisions for more mature ELBW infants may restrict parental decision making.
Similar articles
-
Perceptions of the limit of viability: neonatologists' attitudes toward extremely preterm infants.J Perinatol. 1995 Nov-Dec;15(6):494-502. J Perinatol. 1995. PMID: 8648459
-
Physician counselling practices and decision-making for extremely preterm infants in the Pacific Rim.J Paediatr Child Health. 2005 Apr;41(4):209-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2005.00589.x. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005. PMID: 15813876
-
International comparison of care for very low birth weight infants: parents' perceptions of counseling and decision-making.Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e263-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2274. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 16061579
-
[Extremely preterm infants: resuscitation criteria in the delivery room and dialogue with parents before birth].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004 Feb;33(1 Suppl):S84-7. doi: 10.1016/s0368-2315(04)96671-9. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004. PMID: 14968025 Review. French.
-
Personalized Decision Making: Practical Recommendations for Antenatal Counseling for Fragile Neonates.Clin Perinatol. 2017 Jun;44(2):429-445. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Apr 1. Clin Perinatol. 2017. PMID: 28477670 Review.
Cited by
-
Discuter de la prématurité : une conduite éthique possible.Paediatr Child Health. 2005 Feb;10(2):87-94. Paediatr Child Health. 2005. PMID: 19668602 Free PMC article. French.
-
Supporting parents' decision making surrounding the anticipated birth of an extremely premature infant.J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2009 Apr-Jun;23(2):159-70. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181a2cacc. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19474588 Free PMC article.
-
Daily mortality of infants born at less than 30weeks' gestation.Early Hum Dev. 2016 May;96:27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 25. Early Hum Dev. 2016. PMID: 27018746 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical dilemmas in decision making at limits of neonatal viability.J IMA. 2011 Dec;43(3):188-92. doi: 10.5915/43-3-8972. J IMA. 2011. PMID: 23610507 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of resuscitation preferences on obstetrical management of periviable deliveries.J Perinatol. 2015 Mar;35(3):161-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.175. Epub 2014 Sep 25. J Perinatol. 2015. PMID: 25254331 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources