Effects of sublingual immunotherapy in patients sensitised to Ambrosia. An open controlled study
- PMID: 11269898
Effects of sublingual immunotherapy in patients sensitised to Ambrosia. An open controlled study
Abstract
Background: Allergy to Ambrosia is a disease of growing importance in Europe. Injective and non-injective immunotherapy have been recognised as safe and effective but no evidence is currently available for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients sensitised to Ambrosia. This study was planned to assess the effects and the safety of SLIT in patients clinically sensitised to Ambrosia.
Methods: 19 patients clinically sensitised to Ambrosia and treated with SLIT were compared to 14 patients treated only with drugs. Diary cards with symptoms and drug consumption were filled-in by patients during the pollen season whereas specific nasal challenge and skin prick test were run two months before and after the pollen season. Patients and doctors were also asked to express their subjective assessment about symptoms and drug consumption during the season.
Results: SLIT-treated patients had less symptoms and a significantly minor drug intake (p = 0.04) as compared to untreated patients. Nasal challenge test improved significantly in the SLIT group (p = 0.0001) but not in the control group (p = 0.6875) with a significant difference between groups at the end (p = 0.0413) but not at the beginning of the trial (p = 0.213). The decrease in skin reactivity was significant in the control group (p = 0.0186) and highly significant in the SLIT group (p < 0.0001), with no difference between groups (p = 0.2987). Subjective assessment from both patients and doctors was favorable to SLIT (p = 0.0005 for symptoms; p = 0.0019 for drug consumption). Only one minor local side effect was registered during SLIT.
Conclusions: According to our data, SLIT in patients allergic to Ambrosia is safe and able to improve both subjective and objective parameters.
Comment in
-
New administration routes in immunotherapy.Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2000 Nov-Dec;28(6):295-300. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2000. PMID: 11269895 English, Spanish. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy with a biologically standardized extract of Ambrosia artemisiifolia pollen: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Sep;34(9):1408-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02056.x. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004. PMID: 15347374 Clinical Trial.
-
Sublingual versus injective immunotherapy in grass pollen allergic patients: a double blind (double dummy) study.Clin Exp Allergy. 1996 Nov;26(11):1253-61. Clin Exp Allergy. 1996. PMID: 8955574 Clinical Trial.
-
Rush sublingual immunotherapy in Parietaria allergic patients.Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1996 Jul-Aug;24(4):146-51. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1996. PMID: 8939269 Clinical Trial.
-
The history of sublingual immunotherapy.Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009 Oct-Dec;22(4 Suppl):1-3. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009. PMID: 19944001 Review.
-
Pediatric sublingual immunotherapy efficacy: evidence analysis, 2009-2012.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Jun;110(6):402-415.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Apr 16. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013. PMID: 23706708 Review.
Cited by
-
A review of clinical efficacy, safety, new developments and adherence to allergen-specific immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis caused by allergy to ragweed pollen (Ambrosia artemisiifolia).Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Feb 14;11:247-257. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S70411. eCollection 2017. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017. PMID: 28243068 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical