Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Feb 22;268(1465):399-405.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1392.

Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution?

Affiliations

Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution?

J A Andrés et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

To understand fully the significance of cryptic female choice, we need to focus on each of those postmating processes in females which create variance in fitness among males. Earlier studies have focused almost exclusively on the proportion of a female's eggs fertilized by different males (sperm precedence). Yet, variance in male postmating reproductive success may also arise from differences in ability to stimulate female oviposition and to delay female remating. Here, we present a series of reciprocal mating experiments among genetically differentiated wild-type strains of the housefly Musca domestica. We compared the effects of male and female genotype on oviposition and remating by females. The genotype of each sex affected both female oviposition and remating rates, demonstrating that the signal-receptor system involved has indeed diverged among these strains. Further, there was a significant interaction between the effects of male and female genotype on oviposition rate. We discuss ways in which the pattern of such interactions provides insights into the coevolutionary mechanism involved. Females in our experiments generally exhibited the weakest, rather than the strongest, response to males with which they are coevolved. These results support the hypothesis that coevolution of male seminal signals and female receptors is sexually antagonistic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Oct 7;265(1408):1879-94 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Evol. 1995 Dec;41(6):1085-95 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Zool. 1971 Mar;176(3):353-9 - PubMed
    1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):261-74 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 2000 Jun 15;405(6788):787-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources