Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Jan;54(1):20-4.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.1.20.

Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in breast cancer

Affiliations
Review

Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in breast cancer

H Denley et al. J Clin Pathol. 2001 Jan.

Abstract

The adoption of preoperative diagnostic strategies involving fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or core biopsy is well established, allowing the planning of operating lists and bed occupancy and patient involvement in therapeutic management. In addition to diagnosis, however, pathologists are increasingly being asked to provide pathological prognostic information from preoperative samples. This leader describes techniques for predicting prognosis and response to treatment on these specimens and some of the problems inherent in the determination of prognosis on small samples. For example, although histological grade can be assessed relatively reliably on either core or FNAC samples, the evaluation of tumour type (which includes an overall assessment of the architecture of a given tumour) may be less reliable on small preoperative samples. Other well recognised histological prognostic factors, such as vascular channel invasion or tumour size, cannot be determined accurately on small preoperative samples. For those patients who might benefit from neoadjuvant treatment, predicting the response to such treatments--for example, by the assessment of oestrogen receptor status--can readily be performed on either core biopsy or FNAC. In the future, other molecular markers such as C-erbB-2 might also prove beneficial in predicting response to newly developed treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1999 Aug;31(3):209-23 - PubMed
    1. J Pathol. 1999 Apr;187(5):523-9 - PubMed
    1. Br J Cancer. 1982 Mar;45(3):361-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Cancer. 1982 May;45(5):655-69 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1982 Nov 15;50(10):2131-8 - PubMed

Substances