The influence of clinical information on the reporting of CT by radiologists
- PMID: 11271897
- DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.874.11271897
The influence of clinical information on the reporting of CT by radiologists
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine whether clinical information alters the CT report. This prospective blinded study consisted of 50 consecutive patients who attended a Department of Radiology for CT. Each study was interpreted by two of three consultant radiologists, before and after knowledge of the clinical information. 19 reports were changed after clinical information was known. Clinical follow-up was available in 15 cases. In ten cases the reports were more accurate after clinical information and in five cases the reports were less accurate. In three of the five cases where accuracy was reduced, the clinical information was incorrect. It was concluded that clinical information affects the CT report. If the information is accurate it has a beneficial effect; if it is inaccurate it has a detrimental effect. The more complex the investigation, the more important the clinical information. There was a correlation between readers regarding the influence of clinical information. Correct clinical information therefore improves the radiology report. It is the responsibility of the clinician to provide this information in an accurate and legible form.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks.Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):393-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2312030767. Epub 2004 Mar 18. Radiology. 2004. PMID: 15031431
-
Double reading of current chest CT examinations: Clinical importance of changes to radiology reports.Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan;85(1):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 10. Eur J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26724666
-
A default normal chest CT structured reporting field for coronary calcifications does not cause excessive false-negative reporting.J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Aug;12(8):783-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 May 16. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25987467 Free PMC article.
-
A new method of evaluating the quality of radiology reports.Acad Radiol. 2006 Feb;13(2):241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.10.015. Acad Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16428061
-
[Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, part I].Rofo. 2003 Jan;175(1):46-57. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-36607. Rofo. 2003. PMID: 12525980 German.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the Referring Physician's Clinical History and Indication as a Means for Communicating Chronic Conditions That Are Pertinent at the Point of Radiologic Interpretation.J Digit Imaging. 2015 Jun;28(3):272-82. doi: 10.1007/s10278-014-9751-7. J Digit Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25533493 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of predicting the diagnosis from history on the accuracy of physical examination.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015 Feb 20;6:143-8. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S77315. eCollection 2015. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015. PMID: 25759604 Free PMC article.
-
Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: A sequential-explanatory study.PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Feb 26;3(2):e0000297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000297. eCollection 2024 Feb. PLOS Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 38408043 Free PMC article.
-
A Multimodal Deep Learning Approach to Predicting Systemic Diseases from Oral Conditions.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;12(12):3192. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123192. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36553200 Free PMC article.
-
Does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners' referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study.BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 8;22(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03325-7. BMC Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 35395938 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical