Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Apr;91(3):331-338.
doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00462-0.

The importance of stimulus site and intensity in differences of pain-induced vascular reflexes in human orofacial regions

Affiliations

The importance of stimulus site and intensity in differences of pain-induced vascular reflexes in human orofacial regions

P Kemppainen et al. Pain. 2001 Apr.

Abstract

Studies in anaesthetized animals have indicated that noxious stimulation may produce marked blood flow changes in various orofacial structures, but the influence of painful stimulation on the blood flow regulation of the orofacial area of humans has been studied only to a limited extent. The purpose of this investigation was to study whether there are differences in temporal and spatial patterns of pain-induced vasoactive reflexes between various orofacial regions and hand in healthy human volunteers. Dynamic changes in blood flow in various orofacial regions elicited by painful stimulation of the tooth and finger were measured by means of Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) and computer-assisted infrared thermography (IRT). Blood flow of the finger was recorded by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and plethysmography (PLET). During both stimulus paradigms there was a transient elevation in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). At the same time there was a significant blood flow decrease in the finger (LDF, PLET) and in the nose (LDI, IRT). In contrast to tooth stimulation, finger stimulation caused a more marked blood flow reduction in the finger. Only high intensity tooth stimulation, but not finger stimulation, caused a long-lasting vasodilatation both in lower and upper lip. The blood flow changes in the lips were not correlated with changes in systemic blood pressure or heart rate. In the cheek, there were no marked flow changes during either finger or tooth stimulation. These data indicate that painful tooth (regional) stimulation, but not finger (remote) stimulation, can induce a long-lasting vasodilatation in parts of orofacial tissues which cannot be explained by changes in central cardiovascular parameters. This tooth-stimulation-induced blood flow increase supports the hypothesis of a special vasodilator reflex mechanism in the orofacial area. Furthermore, tooth-stimulation-induced vasoconstriction in the nose and dilatation in the lips indicate that separate vasoactive reflex mechanisms may exist for different orofacial regions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bell C, Jänig W, Kummel H, Xu H. Differentation of vasodilator and sudomotor responses in the cat paw pad to preganglionic sympathetic stimulation. J Physiol. 1985;364:93-104.
    1. Blair DA, Glover WE, Roddie IC. Cutaneous vasomotor nerves to the head and trunk. J Appl Physiol. 1961;16(1):119-122.
    1. Blumberg H, Wallin BG. Direct evidence of neurally mediated vasodilation in hairy skin of the human foot. J Physiol (Lond.). 1987;382:105-121.
    1. Bromm B, Treede RD. Withdrawal reflex, skin resistance and pain rating due to electrical stimulation in man. Pain. 1980;9:399-454.
    1. Drummond PD. The mechanism of facial sweating and cutaneous vascular responses to painful stimulation of the eye. Brain. 1992;115:1417-1428.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources