Promontofixation for the treatment of prolapse
- PMID: 11277060
- DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(01)80017-3
Promontofixation for the treatment of prolapse
Abstract
Genital prolapse is a common problem in women. The wide variety of surgical techniques used to treat this problem demonstrate how difficult it is to manage. Laparoscopic surgery offers a new approach. It allows a good view of the anterior and posterior compartments so that a global approach for the prolapse is possible by the same surgical route. Traditional promontofixation can be combined with a new approach to the posterior compartment. Laparoscopic promontofixation through installation of an intervesicouterine prosthesis for the treatment of hysterocele and cystocele is associated with paravaginal repair of lateral defects and a Burch anterior colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence. When combined with laparoscopic treatment of rectocele by myorrhaphy and reinforcement of the fascia by means of a prosthesis, it provides a complete range of treatment for all types of feminine prolapse. After 20 years of experience through laparotomy, promontofixation using a triangle has been carried out by laparoscopy at the authors' center since 1991 in an attempt to eliminate the cystocele by solidly anchoring the uterus and bladder floor to the promontory. This laparoscopic technique follows the usual steps for pelvic prolapse repair: 1. Total or subtotal hysterectomy or suspension of the uterus is performed in such a way that it returns to normal physiologic position, and a solid subvesical floor is created. 2. The physiologic axis of the vagina is restored by creating a strong, low posterior point of support and by performing culdoplasty. 3. Evident or latent stress incontinence is treated. It would be pointless to treat the hysterocele on its own because, once the prolapse has been cured, the subvesical mass will disappear and allow urinary incontinence to appear. 4. Reconstruction of the posterior rectovaginal support structures seems to be mandatory and is carried out in almost all cases. The first phase of the laparoscopic approach to pelvic prolapse allowed the authors to explore the technical aspects. Several approaches are possible by laparoscopy. Herein, the authors report 8 years of technical research and assessment. This experience confirms the tremendous potential of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of all aspects of this pathology by the same route. Stress incontinence, cystocele, hysterocele, rectocele, or enterocele can be treated. The operative time is longer than with the open route, and the surgeon must be highly experienced. Based on their experience, the authors are discovering new concepts. More data are required before a conclusion can be drawn concerning this promising new approach.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic management of uterine prolapse with cystocele and rectocele using "Gynemesh PS".J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Feb;18(1):93-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.0026. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008. PMID: 18266583
-
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, hysterectomy, and burch colposuspension: feasibility and short-term complications of 77 procedures.JSLS. 2002 Apr-Jun;6(2):115-9. JSLS. 2002. PMID: 12113413 Free PMC article.
-
Techniques of laparoscopic repair of total vault eversion after hysterectomy.J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 Feb;4(2):173-83. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(97)80006-0. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997. PMID: 9050725
-
Laparoscopic paravaginal repair plus burch colposuspension: review and descriptive technique.Urology. 2000 Dec 4;56(6 Suppl 1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00510-0. Urology. 2000. PMID: 11114565 Review.
-
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1002/nau.20542. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008. PMID: 18092333 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-Term Outcomes after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in Young Women.J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 17;11(20):6112. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206112. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36294437 Free PMC article.
-
Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years.Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3093-6. Epub 2016 Aug 22. Int Urogynecol J. 2017. PMID: 27549223
-
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Oct;19(10):1415-22. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0657-0. Epub 2008 Jun 7. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. PMID: 18536861
-
Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial for Laparoscopic Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Sacropexy vs. Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension.J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):2069. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062069. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40142877 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with bone anchor fixation: short-term anatomic and functional results.Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Apr;23(4):481-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1599-5. Epub 2011 Nov 16. Int Urogynecol J. 2012. PMID: 22086264 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical