Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Nov;1(2):82-95.
doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00004.x.

Quality of care from the patients' perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument

Affiliations

Quality of care from the patients' perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument

Herman J. Sixma et al. Health Expect. 1998 Nov.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patient views on quality of care are of paramount importance with respect to the implementation of quality assurance (QA) and improvement (QI) programmes. However, the relevance of patient satisfaction studies is often questioned because of conceptual and methodological problems. Here, it is our belief that a different strategy is necessary. OBJECTIVE: To develop a conceptual framework for measuring quality of care seen through the patients' eyes, based on the existing literature on consumer satisfaction in health care and business research. RESULTS: Patient or consumer satisfaction is regarded as a multidimensional concept, based on a relationship between experiences and expectations. However, where most health care researchers tend to concentrate on the result, patient (dis)satisfaction, a more fruitful approach is to look at the basic components of the concept: expectations (or 'needs') and experiences. A conceptual framework - based on the sequence performance, importance, impact - and quality judgements of different categories of patients derived from importance and performance scores of different health care aspects, is elaborated upon and illustrated with empirical evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The new conceptual model, with quality of care indices derived from importance and performance scores, can serve as a framework for QA and QI programmes from the patients' perspective. For selecting quality of care aspects, a category-specific approach is recommended including the use of focus group discussions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual model of a series of new measuring instruments for quality of care from the patient's perspective.

References

    1. Marquis MS, Ross Davies A, Ware JE. Patient satisfaction and change in medical care provider: a longitudinal study. Medical Care, 1983; 21 : 821 829. - PubMed
    1. Wartman SA, Morlock LL, Malitz FE, Palm EA. Patient understanding and satisfaction as predictors of compliance. Medical Care, 1983; 21 : 886 891. - PubMed
    1. Thomas JW. Relating satisfaction with access to utilization of services. Medical Care, 1984; 22 : 553 568. - PubMed
    1. Donabedian A. Quality assessment and assurance: unity of purpose, diversity of means. Inquiry, 1988; 25 : 173 192. - PubMed
    1. Donabedian A. The Quality of care: how can it be assessed? Journal of the American Medical Association, 1988; 260 : 1743 1748. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources