Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Dec;2(4):222-234.
doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00062.x.

Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting values

Affiliations

Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting values

Penelope M. Mullen. Health Expect. 1999 Dec.

Abstract

There is increasing interest, in the UK and elsewhere, in involving the public in health care priority setting. At the same time, however, there is evidence of lack of clarity about the objectives of some priority setting projects and also about the role of public involvement. Further, some projects display an apparent ignorance of both long-standing theoretical literature and practical experience of methodologies for eliciting values in health care and related fields. After a brief examination of the context of health care priority setting and public involvement, this paper describes a range of different approaches to eliciting values. These approaches are critically examined on a number of dimensions including the type of choice allowed to respondents and the implications of aggregation of values across individuals. Factors which affect the appropriateness of the different techniques to specific applications are discussed. A check-list of questions to be asked when selecting techniques is presented.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Grimley Evans J. Health care rationing and elderly people. In: Tunbridge M. (ed.) Rationing of Health Care in Medicine. London: Royal College of Physicians of London, 1993: 50.
    1. Feuerstein MT. Community participation in evaluation: problems and potentials. International Nursing Review, 1980; 27 (6): 187 187. - PubMed
    1. Arnstein S. A ladder of citizen participation in the USA. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969; 35: 216 224.
    1. Mullen PM, Murray‐Sykes K, Kearns WE. Community health council representation on planning teams: a question of politics. Public Health, 1984; 98 (2): 143 151. - PubMed
    1. Mullen PM. Is it necessary to ration health care? Public Money and Management, 1998; 18 (1): 52 58.

LinkOut - more resources