Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Apr;39(4):1391-5.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1391-1395.2001.

Analysis of Clostridium difficile isolates from nosocomial outbreaks at three hospitals in diverse areas of Japan

Affiliations

Analysis of Clostridium difficile isolates from nosocomial outbreaks at three hospitals in diverse areas of Japan

H Kato et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Apr.

Abstract

Clostridium difficile isolates recovered from patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) at three hospitals located in diverse areas of Japan were analyzed by three typing systems, PCR ribotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and Western immunoblotting. At the three hospitals examined, a single PCR ribotype strain (type smz) was predominant and accounted for 22 (65%) of 34, 18 (64%) of 28, and 11 (44%) of 25 isolates, respectively. All of the 51 isolates that represented PCR ribotype smz were nontypeable by PFGE because of DNA degradation. Since the type smz strain did not react with any of the antisera against 10 different serogroups (A, B, C, D, F, G, H, I, K, and X), we prepared a new antiserum against a type smz isolate. All 51 type smz isolates presented identical banding patterns, reacting with the newly prepared antiserum (designated subserogroup JP-0 of serogroup JP). These results were compared with those of a strain from a hospital outbreak that occurred in New York, which has been identified as type J9 by restriction enzyme analysis and type 01/A by arbitrarily primed PCR but was nontypeable by PFGE because of DNA degradation. This strain was reported to be epidemic at multiple hospitals in the United States. The J9 strain represented a PCR ribotype pattern different from that of a type smz strain and was typed as subserogroup G-1 of serogroup G by immunoblot analysis. A single outbreak type causing nosocomial CDAD in Japan was found to be different from the strain causing multiple outbreaks in the United States, even though the outbreak strains from the two countries were nontypeable by PFGE because of DNA degradation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
PCR ribotype patterns of 12 isolates recovered from CDAD patients in Japan (lanes 1 to 12). Lane MW, standard 100-bp DNA ladder used as a molecular weight standard.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
PFGE patterns of SmaI-digested genomic DNA of 15 isolates recovered from CDAD patients in Japan (lanes 1 to 15). The isolates assigned to PCR ribotypes smz and gr could not be analyzed by PFGE because of DNA degradation. Lanes MW, chromosomal DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae used as molecular weight markers.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
PCR ribotype patterns (A) and immunoblot patterns with serogroup JP antiserum (B-1) and serogroup G antiserum (B-2) of epidemic strains from four hospitals. Lanes: MW, 100-bp DNA ladder used as a molecular weight standard; 1, epidemic strain from hospital A (strain GAI 97660, the reference strain of serogroup JP); 2, epidemic strain from hospital B; 3, epidemic strain from hospital C; 4, epidemic strain from hospital D; G, reference strain of serogroup G (used as a control for immunoblotting).

References

    1. Alfa M J, Kabani A, Lyerly D, Moncrief S, Neville L M, Al-Barrak A, Harding G K, Dyck B, Olekson K, Embil J M. Characterization of a toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strain of Clostridium difficile responsible for a nosocomial outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2706–2714. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bidet P, Lalande V, Salauze B, Burghoffer B, Avesani V, Delmee M, Rossier A, Barbut F, Petit J C. Comparison of PCR-ribotyping, arbitrarily primed PCR, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2484–2487. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brazier J S. The epidemiology and typing of Clostridium difficile. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998;41(Suppl. C):47–57. - PubMed
    1. Cartmill T D, Panigrahi H, Worsley M A, McCann D C, Nice C N, Keith E. Management and control of a large outbreak of diarrhoea due to Clostridium difficile. J Hosp Infect. 1994;27:1–15. - PubMed
    1. Delmée M, Laroche Y, Avesani V, Cornelis G. Comparison of serogrouping and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;24:991–994. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms