Health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and regulatory issues. An assessment of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) recommendations on the use of HR-QOL measures in drug approval
- PMID: 11284382
- DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200119020-00005
Health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and regulatory issues. An assessment of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) recommendations on the use of HR-QOL measures in drug approval
Abstract
Interest in measuring qualitative aspects of life that are most closely related to health and healthcare has increased in recent years. Methods of describing patients' subjective health status now incorporate standardised measures, and several psychometric measures are available. Despite the thousands of empirical and conceptual papers in the medical and pharmacological literature on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), the value of such measures in the regulatory process is still being debated. We conducted an assessment to understand and document the position of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) on the use of HR-QOL measures in studies conducted for regulatory purposes. Official documents produced and circulated by the EMEA containing recommendations on trial design, conduct and analysis for sponsors and scientific experts were independently reviewed by authors to document the position of the Agency on the specific topic of HR-QOL. All documents found in the Agency website on 30 September 1999 were identified and then assessed to: (i) identify diseases or drugs for which formal HR-QOL assessment is recommended; (ii) identify measures and methods recommended; and (iii) evaluate the reliability of recommendations across documents. Of the 189 documents retrieved, none focused directly on health-related quality of life. A few explicit recommendations were identified for 13 specific drugs or conditions. These recommendations were mostly general and vague, and used nonstandard terminology. In addition, terminology and recommendations were not consistent across documents and, in at least one case, were in contrast with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines. EMEA guidelines incorporating quality-of-life outcomes are welcomed but it is obvious that more detailed guidance is required. Closer collaboration between the EMEA and the FDA is also recommended. Experts from different disciplines should be involved in the preparation of such documents to assure the necessary technical expertise and the representativeness of the various counterparts.
Similar articles
-
EMEA and the evaluation of health-related quality of life data in the drug regulatory process.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Summer;20(3):311-24. doi: 10.1017/s0266462304001138. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004. PMID: 15446761 Review.
-
Patient-reported outcomes: assessment and current perspectives of the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration and the reflection paper of the European Medicines Agency.Eur J Cancer. 2009 Feb;45(3):347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.032. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Eur J Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19013787 Review.
-
Health-related quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes in the European centralized drug regulatory process: a review of guidance documents and performed authorizations of medicinal products 1995 to 2003.Value Health. 2005 Sep-Oct;8(5):534-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00051.x. Value Health. 2005. PMID: 16176492 Review.
-
Medicines for children licensed by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Nov;58(8):495-500. doi: 10.1007/s00228-002-0511-0. Epub 2002 Sep 25. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002. PMID: 12451425
-
[Scientific advice by the nationally competent authority and by the EMEA on the conduct of clinical trials].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Apr;48(4):423-8. doi: 10.1007/s00103-005-1022-9. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005. PMID: 15830253 German.
Cited by
-
Usefulness of EQ-5D in assessing health status in primary care patients with major depressive disorder.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 May 5;2:20. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-20. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004. PMID: 15128456 Free PMC article.
-
Novel strategies in immune checkpoint inhibitor drug development: How far are we from the paradigm shift?Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Sep;86(9):1753-1768. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14355. Epub 2020 Jun 13. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 32394468 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The FDA guidance for industry on PROs: the point of view of a pharmaceutical company.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 31;4:85. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-85. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006. PMID: 17076891 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring Patient Quality of Life Following Treatment for Alopecia.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Jul 16;15:1601-1610. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S282399. eCollection 2021. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021. PMID: 34295154 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of quality of life in individuals with severe chronic motor disability: A major challenge.Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2016 May;5(2):83-9. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2016.01017. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2016. PMID: 27195190 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources