Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2001 Mar;24(3):253-64.

[Holmium: YAG and neodymium: YAG laser assisted trans-canalicular dacryocystorhinostomy. Results of 317 first procedures]

[Article in French]
J M Piaton  1 , P Keller, S Limon, S Quenot
Affiliations
  • PMID: 11285440
Comparative Study

[Holmium: YAG and neodymium: YAG laser assisted trans-canalicular dacryocystorhinostomy. Results of 317 first procedures]

[Article in French]
J M Piaton et al. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the results of the first procedures of trans-canalicular dacryocystorhinostomy according to two different lasers: Neodymium: YAG (Nd: YAG) laser or Holmium: YAG (Ho: YAG) laser. To study the efficiency of two anti-metabolite drugs: mitomycin-C (MMC) and 5 fluoro-uracile (5 FU). To analyse the rate of efficiency of the Ho: YAG laser in the canalicular obstructions.

Methods: Three hundred and seventeen patients were operated: 226 with the Nd: YAG laser, 77 with the Ho: YAG laser and 14 with both lasers; 68 were treated with an application of MMC and 40 patients with an application of 5-FU. Sixty-three patients suffered from a canalicular obstruction.

Results: The results are based on 289 procedures 6 months after the operation. The global rate of success was 63.32% after one intervention and 70.24% after one or two revisions. There is no statistically significant difference between Nd: YAG or Ho: YAG lasers. The use of antimetabolites did not improve the success rate. In 65% of the cases the canalicular patency is reached.

Conclusion: Laser-assisted transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy is a very useful method because it does not cause cutaneous scarring and for it has a low rate of morbidity given that it causes very little surgical traumatism. Consequently, it can be used under topical anaesthesia and for patients at risk or suffering from coagulation problems. It can be undertaken in the cases of extremely narrow nasal fossae when an endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy is impossible. This procedure is less successful than external or endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. The success rate is not modified by the use of antimetabolites or by the type of laser.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms