Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Feb;15(2):176-82.
doi: 10.1007/s004640000307.

Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus. A 6 year experience

Affiliations

Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus. A 6 year experience

B M Smithers et al. Surg Endosc. 2001 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Traditionally, esophageal resection has been performed using a thoracotomy to access the intrathoracic esophagus. With the aim to avoid the potential morbidity of the open thoracic approach, mobilization of the esophagus under direct vision recently has been described. We report our experience at attempting thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus in 162 patients during a 6-year period.

Methods: Patients with malignancy or end-stage benign disease of the esophagus considered suitable for a three-stage esophagectomy underwent a thoracoscopy with a view to endoscopic mobilization of the esophagus. Of the 162 patients in whom the procedure was attempted, it was abandoned in 9 patients (6%), and the procedure was converted to open surgery in 11 patients (7%).

Results: In the patients whose esophagus was mobilized, the average blood loss was 165 ml, and the average time for the thoracoscopic segment of the surgery was 104 min. In the 133 patients who underwent a resection for invasive malignancy, a limited mediastinal nodal dissection retrieved an average of 11 nodes, and the median survival was 29 months. The 30-day mortality was 3.3% and the in-hospital mortality 5.3%.

Conclusions: Thoracoscopic mobilization can be performed safely with satisfactory outcomes in a center performing a large volume of esophageal surgery and possessing advanced endoscopic surgery skills. Further assessment of this technique and comparisons with traditional open procedures are needed to assess this approach further as an appropriate oncologic procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Laryngol Otol. 1996 Nov;110(11):1072-4 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 1995 Oct;9(10):1113-5 - PubMed
    1. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1994 Oct;22(5):593-6 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 1999 Mar;13(3):218-23 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1995 Sep;12(5):483-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources