Septic complications of elective laparoscopic colorectal resection
- PMID: 11285969
- DOI: 10.1007/s004640000234
Septic complications of elective laparoscopic colorectal resection
Abstract
Background: We set out to determine the rate and pattern of septic complications of the surgical wound, abdominal cavity, and urinary and respiratory tracts following laparoscopic colorectal resection.
Methods: A longitudinal database of 500 consecutive cases of colorectal resections was reviewed.
Results: The total wound infection rate was 7.2% (36/500) and included infections of the abdominal wall wounds (32/500, 6.4%) and the perineal wounds (4/50, 8%). The anastomotic leak rate in 418 patients who underwent resection with primary anastomosis was 3.3% (14/418). Intraabdominal abscesses were diagnosed in 1% (5/500) of patients. Urinary tract infections were rare (3/500, 0.6%), as was postoperative pneumonia (6/500, 1%).
Conclusions: This study confirms the low rate of postoperative pneumonia observed with all other minimally invasive procedures. Intraabdominal abscesses, urinary tract infections, and postoperative pneumonia occur considerably less frequently than in reported historical controls for open surgery. The rates of abdominal wound infection and anastomotic leak in laparoscopic colorectal resection appear to be equivalent to traditional surgery, whereas the rate of perineal wound sepsis is lower. Comparative studies are needed to determine the differential costs of the septic episodes associated with the two approaches.
Similar articles
-
[Comparison of complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 25;20(2):184-189. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 28226353 Chinese.
-
The minimally invasive approach is associated with reduced surgical site infections in obese patients undergoing proctectomy.Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Dec;19(12):733-43. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1356-8. Epub 2015 Sep 28. Tech Coloproctol. 2015. PMID: 26415943
-
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of 140 cases.Surg Endosc. 1996 Feb;10(2):133-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00188358. Surg Endosc. 1996. PMID: 8932614
-
Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: is it justified?Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2000 Oct;9(4):763-81; discussion 783-4. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2000. PMID: 11008243 Review.
-
Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary?Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Feb;400(2):145-52. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1275-1. Epub 2015 Jan 30. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015. PMID: 25633276 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct;17(10):1530-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8874-y. Epub 2003 Jul 21. Surg Endosc. 2003. PMID: 12874687 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a case-matched study.Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):278-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1174-z. Epub 2010 Jun 29. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20585962
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical