Treatment of intermittent claudication with pentoxifylline and cilostazol
- PMID: 11286146
Treatment of intermittent claudication with pentoxifylline and cilostazol
Abstract
The pathophysiology of intermittent claudication (IC) and the role of pentoxifylline and cilostazol for treating IC are discussed. IC, a result of inadequate blood flow to the musculature, is the primary symptom of occlusive peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Patients with IC often have a decreased quality of life because of mobility limitations. PVD is a sign of generalized atherosclerosis and increases the risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality. Smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and increasing age may hasten the progression of PVD. Strategies for treating IC are aimed at improving symptoms and reducing the progression of atherosclerosis and include risk-factor modification, exercise, and antiplatelet therapy. Cilostazol and pentoxifylline are the only two drugs with FDA-approved labeling for use in treating IC. Both drugs have been shown to increase pain-free walking time and total distance walked, although there is some conflicting evidence for pentoxifylline. Cilostazol and pentoxi-fylline are fairly well tolerated; the most common adverse effects involve the gastrointestinal tract and central nervous system. Inhibitors of cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes 3A4 and 2C19 should be used cautiously in patients taking cilostazol, and this drug is contraindicated in patients with congestive heart failure. Cilostazol is more costly than pentoxifylline. Initiation of therapy with either pentoxifylline or cilostazol may be reasonable if risk-factor modifications, lifestyle changes, and antiplatelet therapy are not effective. The mainstays of therapy for IC are risk-factor modification, exercise, and antiplatelet therapy. If these prove inadequate, treatment with pentoxifylline or cilostazol may be reasonable.
Comment in
-
Cilostazol in intermittent claudication.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Jan 1;59(1):81-2. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.1.81. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002. PMID: 11813475 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cilostazol: new drug. Intermittent claudication: too little efficacy, too many risks.Prescrire Int. 2009 Apr;18(100):56-9. Prescrire Int. 2009. PMID: 19585717
-
Cilostazol: a review of its use in intermittent claudication.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2003;3(2):117-38. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200303020-00006. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2003. PMID: 14727939 Review.
-
Comparative effects of cilostazol and other therapies for intermittent claudication.Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jun 28;87(12A):19D-27D. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01673-3. Am J Cardiol. 2001. PMID: 11434896 Review.
-
Intermittent claudication: effective medical management of a common circulatory problem.Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jun 28;87(12A):14D-18D. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01672-1. Am J Cardiol. 2001. PMID: 11434895 Review.
-
Cost effectiveness of cilostazol compared with naftidrofuryl and pentoxifylline in the treatment of intermittent claudication in the UK.Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jun;21(6):817-26. doi: 10.1185/030079905X41471. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005. PMID: 15969881
Cited by
-
In Vitro/In Vivo Correlation of Two Extended-Release Cilostazol Formulations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jun 16;17(6):787. doi: 10.3390/ph17060787. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38931454 Free PMC article.
-
Niosome as a promising tool for increasing the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory compounds.EXCLI J. 2024 Feb 7;23:212-263. doi: 10.17179/excli2023-6868. eCollection 2024. EXCLI J. 2024. PMID: 38487088 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The comparative efficacy of tyloxapol versus pentoxifylline against induced acute phase response in an ovine experimental endotoxemia model.Inflammopharmacology. 2016 Feb;24(1):59-64. doi: 10.1007/s10787-015-0257-9. Epub 2015 Dec 31. Inflammopharmacology. 2016. PMID: 26721797
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources