Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Mar;4(1):18-28.
doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00113.x.

Involving consumers in a needs-led research programme: a pilot project

Affiliations

Involving consumers in a needs-led research programme: a pilot project

S Oliver et al. Health Expect. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the methods used for involving consumers in a needs-led health research programme, and to discuss facilitators, barriers and goals.

Design: In a short action research pilot study, we involved consumers in all stages of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme: identifying and prioritizing research topics; commissioning and reporting research; and communicating openly about the programme. We drew on the experience of campaigning, self-help and patients' representative groups, national charities, health information services, consumer researchers and journalists for various tasks. We explored consumer literature as a potential source for research questions, and as a route for disseminating research findings. These innovations were complemented by training, one-to-one support and discussion. A reflective approach included interviews with consumers, co-ordinating staff, external observers and other programme contributors, document analysis and multidisciplinary discussion (including consumers) amongst programme contributors.

Results: When seeking research topics, face-to-face discussion with a consumer group was more productive than scanning consumer research reports or contacting consumer health information services. Consumers were willing and able to play active roles as panel members in refining and prioritizing topics, and in commenting on research plans and reports. Training programmes for consumer involvement in service planning were readily adapted for a research programme. Challenges to be overcome were cultural divides, language barriers and a need for skill development amongst consumers and others. Involving consumers highlighted a need for support and training for all contributors to the programme.

Conclusions: Consumers made unique contributions to the HTA Programme. Their involvement exposed processes which needed further thought and development. Consumer involvement benefited from the National Co-ordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment (NCCHTA) staff being comfortable with innovation, participative development and team learning. Neither recruitment nor research capacity were insurmountable challenges, but ongoing effort is required if consumer involvement is to be sustained.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Patients and research.
    Coulter A. Coulter A. Health Expect. 2001 Mar;4(1):1. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00130.x. Health Expect. 2001. PMID: 11286593 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. NHS Executive . Research: What’s in it for consumers?: First report of the Standing Advisory Group on Consumer Involvement in the NHS R & D Programme to the Central Research and Development Committee 1996/7.
    1. Blaxter M. Consumers and research in the NHS: consumer issues within the NHS. In: Consumers in the NHS: an R and D Contribution to Consumer Involvement in the NHS. UK: Department of Health, 1995.
    1. Milne R & Stein K. The NHS R & D Health Technology Assessment programme. In: Baker MR, Kirk S (eds.) Research and Development for the NHS. Evidence, Evaluation and Effectiveness. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1998.
    1. NHS Executive . The Annual Report of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme 1998.
    1. Oliver S & Buchanan P. Examples of lay involvement in research and development. London: Social Science Research Unit, London University Institute of Education, 1997.