Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Mar;4(1):38-47.
doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00112.x.

Citizens' expectations and likely use of a NHS Walk-in Centre: results of a survey and qualitative methods of research

A Chapple  1 , B Sibbald, A Rogers, M Roland
Affiliations

Citizens' expectations and likely use of a NHS Walk-in Centre: results of a survey and qualitative methods of research

A Chapple et al. Health Expect. 2001 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To find out which groups of people would use a National Health Service walk-in centre that would offer mainly health care advice, staffed by nurses. To understand the circumstances in which people would use a walk-in centre and to ascertain to what extent it would meet patients' expressed health-care needs.

Design: A postal survey of 2400 people plus 27 semi-structured interviews and one focus group.

Setting and participants: The study was conducted in Wakefield, Yorkshire UK, and included both white and ethnic minority groups.

Results: Most people reported that they would use a walk-in centre. It would be more attractive to young as compared with older people, ethnic minority as compared with white people, people who are dissatisfied with access to NHS services and people with urgent health-care problems. People want a wide range of services, including diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and general information. People also want access to both doctors and nurses, to male as well as female practitioners, to counsellors and interpreters. The type of service planned for this walk-in centre will meet some of the expressed needs. However, patients' expectations of the walk-in centre exceed planned provision in a number of key respects.

Conclusion: Walk-in centres without GPs and with limited services will disappoint the public. It is important that walk-in centres are evaluated and attention paid to 'local voices' before additional money is allocated for such centres elsewhere.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Klein R & New B. Two Cheers? Reflections on the Health of NHS Democracy London: King’s Fund Publishing, 1998.
    1. Davis H & Daly G. Extended Viewpoint: Achieving democratic potential in the NHS. Public Money and Management, 1999; 19 : 59–62.
    1. Cooper L, Coote A, Davies A & Jackson C. Voices Off. Tackling the Democratic Deficit in Health London: The Institute for Public Policy Research, 1995.
    1. Department of Health . Local Voices: the Views of Local People in Purchasing for Health London: National Health Service Management Executive, 1992.
    1. Coulter A. Seeking the views of citizens. Health Expectations, 1999; 2 : 219–221.