Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):826.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7290.826.

Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trial

J M Borras  1 , A Sanchez-Hernandez, M Navarro, M Martinez, E Mendez, J L Ponton, J A Espinas, J R Germa
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trial

J M Borras et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare chemotherapy given at home with outpatient treatment in terms of colorectal cancer patients' safety, compliance, use of health services, quality of life, and satisfaction with treatment.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Large teaching hospital.

Participants: 87 patients receiving adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Interventions: Treatment with fluorouracil (with or without folinic acid or levamisole) at outpatient clinic or at home.

Main outcome measures: Treatment toxicity; patients' compliance with treatment, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and use of health resources.

Results: 42 patients were treated at outpatient clinic and 45 at home. The two groups were balanced in terms of age, sex, site of cancer, and disease stage. Treatment related toxicity was similar in the two groups (difference 7% (95% confidence interval -12% to 26%)), but there were more voluntary withdrawals from treatment in the outpatient group than in the home group (14% v 2%, difference 12% (1% to 24%)). There were no differences between groups in terms of quality of life scores during and after treatment. Levels of patient satisfaction were higher in the home treatment group, specifically with regard to information received and nursing care. There were no significant differences in use of health services.

Conclusions: Home chemotherapy seemed an acceptable and safe alternative to hospital treatment for patients with colorectal cancer that may improve compliance and satisfaction with treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Progress of participants through trial
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Benjamin AE. An historical perspective on home care policy. Milbank Q. 1993;71:129–166. - PubMed
    1. Sodestrom L, Tonsignant P, Kaufman T. The health and costs effects of substituting home care for inpatient acute care: a review of the evidence. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;160:1151–1155. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shepperd S, Illife S Cochrane Collaboration, editors. Cochrane Library. Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software; 1998. Effectiveness of hospital at home compared with intrahospital care.
    1. Pfister DG. Oncology and high-tech home care. In: Arras J, editor. Bringing hospital to home. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996. pp. 65–78.
    1. Marks L. Home and hospital care: redrawing the boundaries. London: King's Fund; 1992.

Publication types