Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):832.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7290.832.

Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional survey

Affiliations

Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional survey

J Hippisley-Cox et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To study differences in treatment for men and women with ischaemic heart disease by using standards defined in England's national service framework for coronary artery disease.

Design: Cross sectional survey using routinely collected data.

Setting: 18 practices in 18 primary care groups in Trent Region.

Subjects: 5891 men and women aged over 35 years with a diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease or prescription for nitrates recorded on computer.

Main outcome measure: Difference in the proportion of men and women with ischaemic heart disease and taking lipid lowering treatment.

Results: Women were less likely than men to have a recording of body mass index (79% (2197/2783) v 82% (2552/3102), P=0.002), smoking (86% (2386) v 89% (2779), P<0.0001), and blood pressure (95% (2643) v 96% (2986), P=0.04). Women were also less likely to have a recording of fasting cholesterol concentration (35% (968) v 50% (1550), P<0.0001) but were more likely to be obese (25% (558/2197) v 20% (514/2552), P<0.0001) and have their most recently recorded blood pressure value over the recommended 140/85 mm Hg (60% (1598/2643) v 52% (1553/2986), P<0.0001). Although a higher proportion of women had a raised serum cholesterol concentration (77% (749/968) v 67% (1043/1550), P<0.0001), men were more likely to take aspirin (76% (2358) v 71% (1979), P<0.0001), have a recorded diagnosis of hyperlipidaemia (13% (418) v 10% (274), P<0.0001), and be prescribed lipid lowering drugs (31% (973) v 21% (596), P<0.0001). These differences remained despite adjustments for the practice where the patient is registered, age, smoking status, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension.

Conclusion: The results suggest a systematic bias towards men compared with women in terms of secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Department of Health. Our healthier nation. London: Stationery Office; 1998.
    1. Department of Health. National service framework for coronary artery disease: modern standards and service models. London: Stationery Office; 2000.
    1. Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M. Inequalities in access to coronary angiography and revascularisation: the effect of deprivation and location of primary care services. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:449–454. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vogels E, Lagro-Janssen A, van Weel C. Sex differences in cardiovascular disease: are women with low socio-economic status at high risk? Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:963–966. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kee F, Gaffney B, Currie S, O'Reilly D. Access to coronary catheterisation: fair shares for all? BMJ. 1993;307:1305–1307. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms