Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional survey
- PMID: 11290638
- PMCID: PMC30561
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7290.832
Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional survey
Abstract
Objective: To study differences in treatment for men and women with ischaemic heart disease by using standards defined in England's national service framework for coronary artery disease.
Design: Cross sectional survey using routinely collected data.
Setting: 18 practices in 18 primary care groups in Trent Region.
Subjects: 5891 men and women aged over 35 years with a diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease or prescription for nitrates recorded on computer.
Main outcome measure: Difference in the proportion of men and women with ischaemic heart disease and taking lipid lowering treatment.
Results: Women were less likely than men to have a recording of body mass index (79% (2197/2783) v 82% (2552/3102), P=0.002), smoking (86% (2386) v 89% (2779), P<0.0001), and blood pressure (95% (2643) v 96% (2986), P=0.04). Women were also less likely to have a recording of fasting cholesterol concentration (35% (968) v 50% (1550), P<0.0001) but were more likely to be obese (25% (558/2197) v 20% (514/2552), P<0.0001) and have their most recently recorded blood pressure value over the recommended 140/85 mm Hg (60% (1598/2643) v 52% (1553/2986), P<0.0001). Although a higher proportion of women had a raised serum cholesterol concentration (77% (749/968) v 67% (1043/1550), P<0.0001), men were more likely to take aspirin (76% (2358) v 71% (1979), P<0.0001), have a recorded diagnosis of hyperlipidaemia (13% (418) v 10% (274), P<0.0001), and be prescribed lipid lowering drugs (31% (973) v 21% (596), P<0.0001). These differences remained despite adjustments for the practice where the patient is registered, age, smoking status, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension.
Conclusion: The results suggest a systematic bias towards men compared with women in terms of secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease.
Comment in
-
Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in primary care. Clinical decision making is not necessarily guided by prejudice.BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):400. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11548698 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in primary care. Designating sex specific total cholesterol targets may be useful.BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):400-1. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11548699 No abstract available.
-
Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in primary care. Inhouse clinics may help better to manage patients with heart disease.BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):401. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11548701 No abstract available.
References
-
- Department of Health. Our healthier nation. London: Stationery Office; 1998.
-
- Department of Health. National service framework for coronary artery disease: modern standards and service models. London: Stationery Office; 2000.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources