Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):835-40.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7290.835.

Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for patients with schizophrenia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for patients with schizophrenia

R B Jones et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

  • BMJ 2001 May 5;322(7294):1103

Abstract

Objectives: To compare use, effect, and cost of personalised computer education with community psychiatric nurse education for patients with schizophrenia.

Design: Randomised trial of three interventions. Modelling of costs of alternatives.

Participants: 112 patients with schizophrenia in contact with community services; 67 completed the intervention.

Interventions: Three interventions of five educational sessions: (a) computer intervention combining information from patient's medical record with general information about schizophrenia; (b) sessions with a community psychiatric nurse; (c) "combination" (first and last sessions with nurse and remainder with computer).

Main outcome measures: Patients' attendance, opinions, change in knowledge, and psychological state; costs of interventions and patients' use of NHS community services; modelling of costs for these three, and alternative, interventions.

Results: Rates of completion of intervention did not differ significantly (71% for combination intervention, 61% for computer only, 46% for nurse only). Computer sessions were shorter than sessions with nurse (14 minutes v 60 minutes). More patients given nurse based education thought the information relevant. Of 20 patients in combination group, 13 preferred the sessions with the nurse and seven preferred the computer. There were no significant differences between groups in psychological outcomes. Because of the need to transport patients to the computer for their sessions, there was no difference between interventions in costs, but computer sessions combined with other patient contacts would be substantially cheaper.

Conclusions: The computer based patient education offered no advantage over sessions with a community psychiatric nurse. Investigation of computer use combined with other health service contacts would be worth while.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Patient flow through study

References

    1. Eysenbach G. Recent advances: Consumer health informatics. BMJ. 2000;320:1713–1716. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ. 1999;319:731–734. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones RB, Navin LM, Murray KJ. Use of a community-based touch-screen public-access health information system. Health Bull. 1993;51:34–42. - PubMed
    1. Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up and there's no going back. BMJ. 1999;319:719–720. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Kanani R. Systematic review of randomised trials of interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Lancet. 1996;348:383–386. - PubMed

Publication types